Cited by 327Schizophrenia research and treatmentAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Structural disconnectivity in schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging study

Burns, J., Job, D., Bastin, M. E., Whalley, H., Macgillivray, T., Johnstone, E. C., Lawrie, S M.·2003·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: There is growing evidence that schizophrenia is a disorder of cortical connectivity Specifically, frontotemporal and frontoparietal connections are thought to be functionally impaired. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DT–MRI) is a technique that has the potential to demonstrate structural disconnectivity in schizophrenia. Aims: To investigate the structural integrity of frontotemporal and frontoparietal white matter tracts in schizophrenia. Method: Thirty patients with DSM–IV schizophrenia and thirty matched control subjects underwent DT–MRI and structural MRI. Fractional anisotropy – an index of the integrity of white matter tracts – was determined in the uncinate fasciculus, the anterior cingulum and the arcuate fasciculus and analysed using voxel-based morphometry. Results: There was reduced fractional anisotropy in the left uncinate fasciculus and left arcuate fasciculus in patients with schizophrenia compared with controls. Conclusions: The findings of reduced white matter tract integrity in the left uncinate fasciculus and left arcuate fasciculus suggest that there is frontotemporal and frontoparietal structural disconnectivity in schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.182.5.439

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with schizophrenia exhibit structural abnormalities in the cerebral white matter.

    “After more than 2 decades of neuroimaging research, it is now well established that patients with schizophrenia exhibit structural abnormalities in the cerebral white matter.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 327

Authors
Burns, J., Job, D., Bastin, M. E., Whalley, H., Macgillivray, T., Johnstone, E. C., & Lawrie, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Burns, J.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2003-05
Volume
182
Issue
5
Pages
439-443
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2158715164
Cited by
327
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
14.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • University of Edinburgh
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
schizophrenia, white matter integrity, uncinate fasciculus, arcuate fasciculus, anterior cingulum, fronto-temporal connectivity, frontoparietal connectivity, fractional anisotropy, cortical connectivity
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways, Schizophrenia, Case-Control Studies, Anisotropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review