Structural disconnectivity in schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging study
Abstract
Background: There is growing evidence that schizophrenia is a disorder of cortical connectivity Specifically, frontotemporal and frontoparietal connections are thought to be functionally impaired. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DT–MRI) is a technique that has the potential to demonstrate structural disconnectivity in schizophrenia. Aims: To investigate the structural integrity of frontotemporal and frontoparietal white matter tracts in schizophrenia. Method: Thirty patients with DSM–IV schizophrenia and thirty matched control subjects underwent DT–MRI and structural MRI. Fractional anisotropy – an index of the integrity of white matter tracts – was determined in the uncinate fasciculus, the anterior cingulum and the arcuate fasciculus and analysed using voxel-based morphometry. Results: There was reduced fractional anisotropy in the left uncinate fasciculus and left arcuate fasciculus in patients with schizophrenia compared with controls. Conclusions: The findings of reduced white matter tract integrity in the left uncinate fasciculus and left arcuate fasciculus suggest that there is frontotemporal and frontoparietal structural disconnectivity in schizophrenia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients with schizophrenia exhibit structural abnormalities in the cerebral white matter.
“After more than 2 decades of neuroimaging research, it is now well established that patients with schizophrenia exhibit structural abnormalities in the cerebral white matter.”
From Schizophrenia, myelination, and delayed corollary discharges: a hypothesis (2012) · cites this paper as [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 327
- Authors
- Burns, J., Job, D., Bastin, M. E., Whalley, H., Macgillivray, T., Johnstone, E. C., & Lawrie, S. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Burns, J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 439-443
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2158715164
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 14.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- University of Edinburgh
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, white matter integrity, uncinate fasciculus, arcuate fasciculus, anterior cingulum, fronto-temporal connectivity, frontoparietal connectivity, fractional anisotropy, cortical connectivity
- MeSH terms
- Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways, Schizophrenia, Case-Control Studies, Anisotropy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review