Cited by 71Schizophrenia research and treatmentParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsDiabetes Treatment and Management

Antipsychotics and diabetes: review of non-prospective data

Open access
Haddad, Peter M.·2004·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Much of the existing data regarding the relationship between antipsychotic medications and diabetes mellitus are non-prospective. Aims: To review critically non-prospective studies examining antipsychotic medications as risk factors for diabetes mellitus. Method: Database and manual searches. Results: Anecdotal reports indicate that conventional and atypical antipsychotics can cause diabetes mellitus. However, retrospective studies cannot reliably quantify this association, as they do not adequately control for confounding risk factors for diabetes, or for variation in detection and diagnosis of this illness. Most studies report a higher rate of diabetes in patients who use antipsychotic medication than in non-users, and in patients taking atypical v. conventional antipsychotics. Studies assessing the relative risks of diabetes between individual atypical antipsychotics are contradictory. Conclusions: Retrospective data are of limited value. Well-designed prospective studies, which account for potential confounders, are needed to investigate the true association between antipsychotic medications and diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.184.47.s80

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Braceland, F. J., Meduna, L. J.,Vaichulis, J. A. (1946) Delayed action of insulin in schizophrenia. Delayed action of insulin in schizophrenia. American American Journal of Psychiatry Journal of Psychiatry, , 102 102, 108^109. , 108^109.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haddad, P. M.
Corresponding author
Haddad, Peter M.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2004-04
Volume
184
Issue
S47
Pages
s80-s86
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2120802149
Cited by
71
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
antipsychotic drugs, diabetes mellitus, atypical antipsychotics, typical antipsychotics, drug-induced diabetes, retrospective analysis, relative risk, prospective study
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review