The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stimulant psychosis: systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Background: Psychosis associated with stimulant use is an increasing problem, but there is little research evidence about the nature of the problem and its management. Aims: To critically review the literature on stimulant psychosis and sensitisation. Method: Systematic review of studies that have investigated stimulant use and psychosis in humans. The main outcome measures were increases in psychosis with stimulant use, and differences between stimulant users and non-users. Results: Fifty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Experimental studies show that a single dose of a stimulant drug can produce a brief increase in psychosis ratings (a ‘response’) in 50–70% of participants with schizophrenia and preexisting acute psychotic symptoms, unaffected by the presence of antipsychotic medication. Those with schizophrenia who do not have acute psychotic symptoms respond, but less frequently (30%). There has been little research into the longer-term effects of use. Conclusions: Compliance with antipsychotic medication by someone with schizophrenia will not prevent a relapse or worsening of psychotic symptoms if stimulants are used. Low-dose antipsychotic treatment may be beneficial in stimulant users, to prevent sensitisation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Camí, J., Farré, M., Mas, M., Roset, P. N., Poudevida, S., Mas, A., San, L., & de la Torre, R. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/00004714-200008000-00010 · Cited by 234
Bartlett, E. (1997) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(96)00164-9 · Cited by 160
Cited by
Schizophrenia: an integrated sociodevelopmental-cognitive model
Howes, O. D., & Murray, R. M. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62036-x · Cited by 864
Major physical and psychological harms of methamphetamine use
DARKE, S., KAYE, S., McKETIN, R., & DUFLOU, J. (2008) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1080/09595230801923702 · Cited by 675
Stress and the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis in the developmental course of schizophrenia
Walker, E., Mittal, V., & Tessner, K. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.4.022007.141248 · Cited by 615
van Winkel, R., Stefanis, N. C., & Myin-Germeys, I. (2008) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn101 · Cited by 489
The prevalence of psychotic symptoms among methamphetamine users
McKetin, R., McLaren, J., Lubman, D. I., & Hides, L. (2006) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01496.x · Cited by 393
Metadata
- Authors
- Curran, C., Byrappa, N., & McBride, A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 185
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 196-204
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2156004707
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.