Cited by 322Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Measuring autistic traits: heritability, reliability and validity of the Social and Communication Disorders Checklist

Open access
Skuse, David H., Mandy, William P. L., Scourfield, Jane·2005·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Autistic traits are widely distributed in the general population, but the boundaries of the autistic spectrum are unclear. Whole-population surveys of unselected samples of children are hampered by the lack of appropriate screening instruments. Aims: To assess whether the Social and Communication Disorders Checklist (SCDC) fulfils the need for a sensitive measure of autistic traits, which can be completed in a few minutes and which measures heritable characteristics in both males and females. Method: A 12-item scale, the SCDC, was completed by three independent samples drawn from a twin register, a group with Turner syndrome and children with a diagnosis of autistic-spectrum disorder attending clinics. The data were used to establish the heritability reliability and validity of the checklist. Results: Traits measured by the SCDC were highly heritable in both genders (0.74). Internal consistency was excellent (0.93) and test–retest reliability high (0.81). Discriminant validity between pervasive developmental disorder and other clinical groups was good, discrimination from non-clinical samples was better; sensitivity (0.90), specificity (0.69). Conclusions: The SCDC is a unique and efficient first-level screening questionnaire for autistic traits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.187.6.568

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 322

Authors
Skuse, D. H., Mandy, W. P. L., & Scourfield, J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Skuse, David H.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2005-12
Volume
187
Issue
6
Pages
568-572
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2128577302
Cited by
322
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
autistic traits, autism spectrum disorder, heritability, screening questionnaire, twin registry, Turner syndrome, pervasive developmental disorders, discriminant validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Diseases in Twins, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Mass Screening, Phenotype, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Turner Syndrome, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review