Measuring autistic traits: heritability, reliability and validity of the Social and Communication Disorders Checklist
Open accessAbstract
Background: Autistic traits are widely distributed in the general population, but the boundaries of the autistic spectrum are unclear. Whole-population surveys of unselected samples of children are hampered by the lack of appropriate screening instruments. Aims: To assess whether the Social and Communication Disorders Checklist (SCDC) fulfils the need for a sensitive measure of autistic traits, which can be completed in a few minutes and which measures heritable characteristics in both males and females. Method: A 12-item scale, the SCDC, was completed by three independent samples drawn from a twin register, a group with Turner syndrome and children with a diagnosis of autistic-spectrum disorder attending clinics. The data were used to establish the heritability reliability and validity of the checklist. Results: Traits measured by the SCDC were highly heritable in both genders (0.74). Internal consistency was excellent (0.93) and test–retest reliability high (0.81). Discriminant validity between pervasive developmental disorder and other clinical groups was good, discrimination from non-clinical samples was better; sensitivity (0.90), specificity (0.69). Conclusions: The SCDC is a unique and efficient first-level screening questionnaire for autistic traits.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The SCQ has robust psychometric properties.
“The SCQ has robust psychometric properties [26-28].”
From Clinical outcomes of an early intervention program for preschool children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in a community group setting. (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 322
- Authors
- Skuse, D. H., Mandy, W. P. L., & Scourfield, J.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Cardiff University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Skuse, David H.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 568-572
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2128577302
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- autistic traits, autism spectrum disorder, heritability, screening questionnaire, twin registry, Turner syndrome, pervasive developmental disorders, discriminant validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, gender differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Diseases in Twins, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Mass Screening, Phenotype, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Turner Syndrome, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review