Cited by 121Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCrime Patterns and InterventionsIntimate Partner and Family Violence

Violence and psychiatric morbidity in the national household population of Britain: public health implications

Open access
Coid, Jeremy, Yang, Min, Roberts, Amanda, Ullrich, Simone, Moran, Paul, Bebbington, Paul, Brugha, Traolach, Jenkins, Rachel +3 more·2006·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: It is unclear whether psychiatric morbidity contributes to the small proportion of the population responsible for a large percentage of antisocial behaviour, including violence. Aims: To measure associations between psychiatric morbidity and severity chronicity and types of victims of violence in the national household population of Britain. Method: Cross-sectional survey of persons in households (n=8397). Data included self-reported location, victims and outcome of violence over the previous 5 years. Diagnoses were determined by computer-assisted interviews. Results: Hazardous drinking was associated with over half of all incidents involving injury. Antisocial personality disorder conveyed an attributable risk of 24% of respondents reporting victim injuries, but screening positive for psychosis conveyed an attributable risk of only 1.2%. Conclusions: The burden of care resulting from violence associated with hazardous drinking supports population interventions. Despite exceptional risks, half of respondents with antisocial personality disorder were not violent, indicating limitations in targeted interventions to detain high-risk individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.189.1.12

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coid, J., Yang, M., Roberts, A., Ullrich, S., Moran, P., Bebbington, P., Brugha, T., Jenkins, R., Farrell, M., Lewis, G., & Singleton, N.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Office for National Statistics (GB)
Corresponding author
Coid, Jeremy
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2006-07
Volume
189
Issue
1
Pages
12-19
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2101375137
Cited by
121
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Keywords
violence, psychiatric morbidity, antisocial behavior, antisocial personality disorder, psychosis, hazardous drinking, victim injury, attributable risk, public health interventions, targeted interventions, household population
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Mental Disorders, England, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Public Health, Recurrence, Scotland, Violence, Wales, Wounds and Injuries, Crime Victims, Alcohol-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review