Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interpretation of ecological data

Open access
Riordan, Daniel Vincent, Stark, Cameron·2010·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Interpretation of ecological dataWe read the debate on antidepressants and suicide 1 with interest, especially the issue concerning the importance of controlling for possible confounding variables in ecological studies and the associated difficulties in drawing conclusions from such ecological observations.One potentially important confounder, which has been overlooked, is the size of the family of origin.Birth cohort studies from Scotland 2 and Norway 3 suggest that having elder siblings may be linked with an increased risk of suicide.As the total fertility rates (a reasonable proxy for average family size) fell across most Western countries between the 1950s and 1970s, 4 it is plausible that some of the decline in suicide rates observed from the late 1980s onwards may be, in part at least, a resultant cohort effect.1 Isacsson G, Rich CL /Jureidini J, Raven M. The increased use of antidepressants has contributed to the worldwide reduction in suicide rates (debate).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.197.4.332

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 405

Metadata

Authors
Riordan, D. V., & Stark, C.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-10
Volume
197
Issue
4
Pages
332-332
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W1975921848
Cited by
405
References
7
FWCI
10.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interpretation of ecological data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1192/bjp.197.4.332
The paper
Riordan, D. V., & Stark, C. (2010). Interpretation of ecological data. British Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.197.4.332

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.