The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mental capacity in psychiatric patients: Systematic review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Mental capacity is central to legal and ethical debates on the use of compulsion in psychiatry. AIMS: To describe the clinical epidemiology of mental incapacity in patients with psychiatric disorders, including interrater reliability of assessments, frequency in the psychiatric population and associations of mental incapacity. METHOD: Cross-sectional studies of capacity to consent to treatment for psychiatric patients were systematically reviewed from Medline, EMBASE and PsycInfo databases. Information on the reliability of assessments, frequency and associations of mental incapacity was extracted. RESULTS: Out of 37 papers reviewed, 29 different capacity assessment tools were identified. Studies were highly heterogeneous in their measurement and definitions of capacity. Interrater reliabilities between tools were high. Studies indicate incapacity is common (median 29%) but the majority of psychiatric in-patients are capable of making treatment decisions. Psychosis, severity of symptoms, involuntary admission and treatment refusal were the strongest risk factors for incapacity. CONCLUSIONS: Mental capacity can be reliably assessed. The majority of psychiatric in-patients have capacity, and socio-demographic variables do not have a major impact but clinical ones do.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In 2007, a review concluded that the majority of psychiatric patients have capacity, that clinical variables have an influence on the capacity for treatment decisions, and that its evaluation can be easily replicated (Okai et al., 2007).”
From Decision making capacity for treatment in psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Okai et al., 2007
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The remaining studies show high heterogeneity in the decision to be evaluated, without specifying the treatment (Kahn et al., 2009;Okai et al., 2007;G. S. Owen et al., 2008G. S. Owen et al., , 2011) ) as well as in the rate of incapacity, which ranges from 10% to 87% in the samples.”
From Decision making capacity for treatment in psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Okai et al., 2007
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As in (Okai et al., 2007), we found that capacity assessments for treatment decisions have strong inter-rater reliability, either when professionals evaluate this jointly or on separate occasions.”
From Decision making capacity for treatment in psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Okai et al., 2007
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A review by Okai et al. (2007) suggested that most psychiatric inpatients have DMC, and its assessment is reliable.”
From Decision making capacity for treatment in psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Okai et al., 2007
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In 2007, a review concluded that the majority of psychiatric patients have capacity, that clinical variables have an influence on the capacity for treatment decisions, and that its evaluation can be easily replicated (Okai et al., 2007).”
From Decision making capacity for treatment in psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Okai et al., 2007
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine.
(1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-9-825_9 · Cited by 3,497
Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta‐Analysis in Context
(2001) · doi:10.1002/9780470693926 · Cited by 1,693
Clinical Epidemiology - a basic science for clinical medicine
HOFFBRAND, B. I. (1992) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.68.806.987-a · Cited by 780
Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables
Altman, D. G. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7306.224 · Cited by 756
The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients' capacities to make treatment decisions
(1997) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.48.11.1415 · Cited by 704
Tests of competency to consent to treatment
Roth, L. H., Meisel, A., & Lidz, C. W. (1977) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.134.3.279 · Cited by 662
Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1995) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01499323 · Cited by 595
The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. I: Mental illness and competence to consent to treatment.
Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1995) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01499321 · Cited by 424
Raymont, V., Bingley, W., Buchanan, A. W., David, A. S., Hayward, P., Wessely, S. C., & Hotopf, M. H. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17224-3 · Cited by 390
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 2005, EHRR, 40, 32
- Schneider, 1998, The Practice of Autonomy
- Norko, 1990, A clinical study of competency to consent to voluntary psychiatric hospitalization, American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 11, 3
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mental Health Context of Food Insecurity: a Representative Cohort of Families With Young Children
Melchior, M., Caspi, A., Howard, L. M., Ambler, A. P., Bolton, H., Mountain, N., & Moffitt, T. E. (2009) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0583 · Cited by 282
Patient involvement in mental health care: one size does not fit all
Tambuyzer, E., Pieters, G., & Audenhove, C. V. (2011) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00743.x · Cited by 240
Szmukler, G. (2019) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20584 · Cited by 213
Owen, G. S., Richardson, G., David, A. S., Szmukler, G., Hayward, P., & Hotopf, M. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39580.546597.be · Cited by 172
Self-citationWhat does the future hold for the NHS at 60?
Klein, R. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a549 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Okai, D., Owen, G., McGuire, H., Singh, S., Churchill, R., & Hotopf, M.
- Affiliations
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hotopf, Matthew
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 191
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 291-297
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2157242561
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Keywords
- decision-making capacity, psychiatric patients, capacity assessment, inter-rater reliability, treatment refusal, involuntary admission, psychosis, symptom severity, psychiatric inpatients, clinical epidemiology
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Hospitalization, Humans, Informed Consent, Interview, Psychological, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Bibliographic, Mental Competency, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Mentally Ill Persons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
