Cited by 165Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computer-aided psychotherapy: revolution or bubble?

Open access
Marks, I. M., Cavanagh, K., Gega, L.·2007·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Research into computer-aided psychotherapy is thriving around the world. Most of it concerns computer-aided cognitive-behavioural therapy (CCBT). A recent narrative review found 97 computer-aided psychotherapy systems from nine countries reported in 175 studies, of which 103 were randomised controlled trials. The rapid spread of the mass delivery of psychotherapy through CCBT, catalysed in the UK by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence's recommendation of two CCBT programmes and the Department of Health's CCBT implementation guidance, seems unprecedented. This editorial is a synopsis of the current status of CCBT and its future directions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.041152

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 2006a, Guidance on the Use of Computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Anxiety and Depression.
  2. 2006b, Appraisal of Computerised Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CCBT) for Depression and Anxiety: Decision of Panel.
  3. 2002, Guidance on the Use of Computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Anxiety and Depression.
  4. 2007, Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) Programme: Computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (cCBT) Implementation Guidance.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–165 of 165

Metadata

Authors
Marks, I. M., Cavanagh, K., & Gega, L.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Marks, I. M.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2007-12
Volume
191
Issue
6
Pages
471-473
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2003458874
Cited by
165
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
NICE guidelines, digital mental health, future research directions
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depressive Disorder, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review