Postcard intervention for repeat self-harm: randomised controlled trial.
Open accessAbstract
Background: Self-harm and suicidal behaviour are common reasons for emergency department presentation. Those who present with self-harm have an elevated risk of further suicidal behaviour and death. Aims: To examine whether a postcard intervention reduces self-harm re-presentations in individuals presenting to the emergency department. Method: Randomised controlled trial conducted in Christchurch, New Zealand. The intervention consisted of six postcards mailed during the 12 months following an index emergency department attendance for self-harm. Outcome measures were the proportion of participants re-presenting with self-harm and the number of re-presentations for self-harm in the 12 months following the initial presentation. Results: After adjustment for prior self-harm, there were no significant differences between the control and intervention groups in the proportion of participants re-presenting with self-harm or in the total number of re-presentations for self-harm. Conclusions: The postcard intervention did not reduce further self-harm. Together with previous results this finding suggests that the postcard intervention may be effective only for selected subgroups.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some but not all studies have reported similar findings with mail interventions.
“Some [33][34][35] but not all 36 studies have reported similar findings with mail interventions.”
From Comparison of the Safety Planning Intervention With Follow-up vs Usual Care of Suicidal Patients Treated in the Emergency Department (2018) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 120
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [4]4. Gibb SJ, Beautrais AL. Epidemiology of attempted suicide in Canterbury 1993-2002. N Z Med J 2004; 1205: 1-9.
- [10]10. Guthrie E, Kapur N, Mackway-Jones K, Chew-Graham C, Moorey J, Mendel E, et al. Randomised controlled trial of brief psychological intervention after deliberate self poisoning. BMJ 2001; 323: 135.
- Authors
- Beautrais, A. L., Gibb, S. J., Faulkner, A., Fergusson, D. M., & Mulder, R. T.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Canterbury District Health Board (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Beautrais, Annette L.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 197
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-60
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2159488334
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 10.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Accident Compensation Corporation
- University of Otago
- Canterbury District Health Board
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- self-harm, repeat self-harm, emergency department presentation, suicidal behavior, suicide prevention, follow-up care, intervention effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Postal Service, Suicide, Attempted, Correspondence as Topic, Self-Injurious Behavior, Secondary Prevention, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review