Cited by 127Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

Impact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion

Open access
van der Schaaf, P. S., Dusseldorp, E., Keuning, F. M., Janssen, W. A., Noorthoorn, E. O.·2013·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The physical environment is presumed to have an effect on aggression and also on the use of seclusion on psychiatric wards. Multicentre studies that include a broad variety of design features found on psychiatric wards and that control for patient, staff and general ward characteristics are scarce. Aims: To explore the effect of design features on the risk of being secluded, the number of seclusion incidents and the time in seclusion, for patients admitted to locked wards for intensive psychiatric care. Method: Data on the building quality and safety of psychiatric as well as forensic wards (n = 199) were combined with data on the frequency and type of coercive measures per admission (n = 23 868 admissions of n = 14 834 patients) on these wards, over a 12-month period. We used non-linear principal components analysis (CATPCA) to reduce the observed design features into a smaller number of uncorrelated principal components. Two-level multilevel (logistic) regression analyses were used to explore the relationship with seclusion. Admission was the first level in the analyses and ward was the second level. Results: Overall, 14 design features had a significant effect on the risk of being secluded during admission. The ‘presence of an outdoor space’, 'special safety measures' and a large ‘number of patients in the building’ increased the risk of being secluded. Design features such as more ‘total private space per patient’, a higher ‘level of comfort’ and greater ‘visibility on the ward’, decreased the risk of being secluded. Conclusions: A number of design features had an effect on the use of seclusion and restraint. The study highlighted the need for a greater focus on the impact of the physical environment on patients, as, along with other interventions, this can reduce the need for seclusion and restraint.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.118422

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Die Häufigkeit der Anwendung von Isolationsmaßnahmen ist von bestimmten baulichen Gegebenheiten abhängig.

    “Die Häufigkeit der Anwendung von Isolationsmaßnahmen ist ebenfalls von bestimmten baulichen Gegebenheiten abhängig (van der Schaaf, Dusseldorp, Keuning, Janssen & Noorthoorn, 2013).”

    From Burg Lino – Ein innenarchitektonisches Konzept zur Verbesserung der stationären Behandlung in der Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie (2019) · cites this paper as van der Schaaf, Dusseldorp, Keuning, Janssen & Noorthoorn, 2013

    The Multilevel analyses section reports that ward design features significantly affected the risk of a patient being secluded during admission. That supports an association with architectural features, but the Main findings section says the number of seclusions showed no significant effect. The claim’s wording about frequency therefore goes beyond the supported finding about risk. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Currier GW. The controversy over 'chemical restraint' in acute care psychiatry. J Psychiatr Prac 2003; 9: 59-70.
  2. Sailas E, Fenton M. Seclusion and Restraint for People with Serious Mental Illnesses (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, 2003.
  3. Olofsson B, Norberg A. Experiences of coercion in psychiatric care as narrated by patients, nurses and physicians. J Adv Nurs 2001; 33: 89-97.
  4. Nijman HLI, Allertz W, Merckelbach HLGJ, a `Campo JLMG, Ravelli DP. Aggressive behaviour on an acute psychiatric admissions ward. Eur J Psychiat 1997; 11: 106-14.
  5. Bower FL, McCullough CS, Timmons ME. A synthesis of what we know about the use of physical restraint and seclusion with patients in psychiatric and acute care settings. Online J Knowl Synth Nurs 2003; 10: 1.
  6. Wynn R. Medicate, restrain or seclude? Strategies for dealing with violent and threatening behaviour in a Norwegian university psychiatric hospital. Scand J Caring Sci 2002; 16: 287-91.
  7. Taylor TL, Killaspy H, Wright C, Turton P, White S, Kallert TW, et al. A systematic review of the international published literature relating to quality of institutional care for people with longer term mental health problems. BMC Psychiatry 2009; 9: 55.
  8. Vaaler AE, Morken G, Linaker OM. Effects of different interior decorations in the seclusion area of a psychiatric acute ward. Nord J Psychiatry 2005; 59: 19-24.
  9. Wilson MR, Soth N, Robak R. Managing disturbed behavior by architectural changes; making space fit the program. Milieu Ther 1983; 2: 15-24.
  10. Dijkstra K, Pieterse ME, Pruyn A. Physical environmental stimuli that turn healthcare facilities into healing environments through psychologically mediated effects, systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2006; 56: 166-81.
  11. Gross R, Sasson Y, Zarhy M, Zohar J. Healing environment in psychiatric hospital design. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1998; 20: 108-14.
  12. Steinert T, Lepping P, Bernhardsgru ¨tter R, Conca A, Hatling T, Janssen W, et al. Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2009; 46: 889-97.
  13. Soorgaard KW. Patients' perceptions of coercion in acute psychiatric wards: an intervention study. Nord J Psychiatry 2004; 58: 4-8.
  14. Moran A, Cocoman A, Scott P, Matthews A, Staniuliene V, Valimaki M. Restraint and seclusion: a distressing treatment option? J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2009; 16: 599-605.
  15. Janssen WA, Sande van de R, Noorthoorn EO, Nijman HLI, Bowers L, Mulder CL, et al. Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures. Int J Law Psychiatry 2011; 34: 429-38.
  16. Janssen WA, Noorthoorn EO, de Vries WJ, Hutschemeakers GJ, Lendemeijer HH, Widdershoven GA. The use of seclusion in the Netherlands compared to countries in and outside Europe. Int J Law Psychiatry 2008; 31: 463-70.
  17. Startup M, Jackson M, Bendix S. The concurrent validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Br J Clin Psychol 2002; 41: 417-22.
  18. Ulrich RS, Zimring C, Zhu X, DuBose J, Seo H, Choi Y, et al. A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. HERD 2008; 1: 102-65.
  19. Linting M, Meulman J, Groenen, P, van der Kooij A. Nonlinear principal components analysis: introduction and application. Psychol Methods 2007; 12: 336-58.
  20. Ulrich RS, Simon RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 1991; 11: 201-30.
  21. Dijkstra K, Pieterse ME, Pruyn A. Stress-reducing effects of indoor plants in built healthcare environment. The mediating role of perceived attractiveness. Prev Med 2008; 47: 279-83.
  22. Zeisel J, Silverstein NM, Hyde J, Levkoff S, Powell Lawton M, Holmes W. Environmental correlates to behavioral health outcomes in Alzheimer's special care units. Gerontologist 2003; 43: 697-711.
  23. Bowie P, Mountain G, The relationship between patient behaviour and the environmental quality for the dementing. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1997; 12: 718-23.
  24. Middelboe T, Schjødt T, Byrsting K, Gjerris A. Ward atmosphere in acute psychiatric in-patient care: patients' perceptions, ideals and satisfaction. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001; 103: 212-9.
  25. Evans GW. The build Environment and Mental Health. J Urban Health 2003; 80: 536-55.
  26. Karlin BE, Zeiss RA. Environmental and therapeutic issues in psychiatric hospital design: toward best practices. Psychiatr Serv 2006; 57: 1376-8.
  27. Evans GW, Mitchell McCoy J. When buildings don't work: the role of architecture in human health. J Environ Psychol 1998; 18: 85-94.
  28. Bowers L, van der Werf B, Vokkolainen A, Muir-Cochrane E, Allan T, Alexander J. International variation in attitudes to coercive measures for disturbed psychiatric inpatients. Int J Nurs Stud 2007; 44: 357-64.
  29. Douglas CH, Douglas MR. Patient-centred improvements in healthcare built environments: perspectives and design indicators. Health Expect 2005; 8: 264-76.
  30. Gaskin CJ, Elsom SJ, Happell B. Interventions for reducing the use of seclusion in psychiatric facilities. Review of the literature. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 191: 298-303.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Schaaf, P. S., Dusseldorp, E., Keuning, F. M., Janssen, W. A., & Noorthoorn, E. O.
Affiliations
  • Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
  • GGNet (NL)
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2013-02
Volume
202
Issue
2
Pages
142-149
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2066573625
Cited by
127
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
FWCI
9.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
seclusion, physical environment, coercive measures, restraint, locked wards, aggression, outdoor space
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aggression, Mental Disorders, Child, Coercion, Female, Forensic Psychiatry, Health Facility Environment, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Patient Isolation, Patients' Rooms, Restraint, Physical, Privacy, Principal Component Analysis, Multilevel Analysis, Young Adult, Patient Safety, Nursing Stations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review