Cited by 94Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Lithium treatment and risk for dementia in adults with bipolar disorder: Population-based cohort study

Open access
Gerhard, Tobias, Devanand, D. P., Huang, Cecilia, Crystal, Stephen, Olfson, Mark·2015·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Lithium inhibits glycogen synthase kinase-3, an enzyme implicated in the pathogenesis of dementia. Aims: To examine the association of lithium and dementia risk in a large claims-based US cohort of publicly insured older adults with bipolar disorder. Method: The cohort included individuals ⩾50 years diagnosed with bipolar disorder who did not receive dementia-related services during the prior year. Each follow-up day was classified by past-year cumulative duration of lithium use (0, 1–60, 61–300 and 301–365 days). Dementia diagnosis was the study outcome. Anticonvulsants commonly used as mood stabilisers served as a negative control. Results: Compared with non-use, 301–365 days of lithium exposure was associated with significantly reduced dementia risk (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77, 95% CI 0.60–0.99). No corresponding association was observed for shorter lithium exposures (HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.83–1.31 for 61–300 days; HR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.67–1.71 for 1–60 days) or for any exposure to anticonvulsants. Conclusions: Continuous lithium treatment may reduce dementia risk in older adults with bipolar disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.154047

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 94

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern Epidemiology. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008.

Authors
Gerhard, T., Devanand, D. P., Huang, C., Crystal, S., & Olfson, M.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Gerhard, Tobias
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2015-07
Volume
207
Issue
1
Pages
46-51
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2159162735
Cited by
94
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (U19HS021112, U19 HS021112-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
lithium, bipolar disorder, dementia risk, glycogen synthase kinase-3, mood stabilizers, antiepileptic drugs, older adults, dementia prevention
MeSH terms
Aged, Bipolar Disorder, Dementia, Female, Medicare, Humans, Lithium, Male, Medicaid, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Treatment Outcome, Antimanic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review