The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The relationship between stigma and help‐seeking intentions in college students
Abstract
Introduction: Few people seek mental health care despite the high prevalence of mental illnesses and their serious consequences. Barriers explaining this lack or absence of help-seeking have been the subject of several studies with stigma being the most prominent barrier. Objectives: We aimed to assess the relationship between stigma and help-seeking intentions in a sample of Tunisian college students. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey. The “Mental Health Knowledge Schedule”, and the “Reported and Intended Behavior Scale” were administered to a total of 714 college students (62.2% female; mean age =20.9). Results: More than one-third of students (39.6%) felt that it would be “unlikely” or “very unlikely” to seek the help of a health professional for mental health problems. Pearson product moment correlations indicated that help-seeking intentions significantly and positively correlated with behavior (p<0.001, r=0,103) and knowledge (p<0.001, r=0,163). The multiple hierarchical linear regression analysis found that after controlling for demographic variables (gender, age) and other personal-related variables (marital status, family income, living environment, substance use, personal psychiatric history), help-seeking intentions were significant contributors to behaviors and knowledge. Conclusions: Given that stigma and discrimination against people with mental illness is a real and perceived barrier to seeking help and treatment, psycho-educational campaigns should be put in place to address the negative perceptions and attitudes of the general population about mental health issues, and should be tailored to the needs of specific groups (including students in different disciplines), taking into account their attitudes, fear and concerns about mental illness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“despite these resources, college students with mental health conditions continue to show both relatively low intentions to seek help and limited help‐seeking behaviors (Abassi, Fekih‐Romdhane, Maktouf, & Moalla, 2021).”
From Research Review: Help‐seeking intentions, behaviors, and barriers in college students – a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Abassi, Fekih‐Romdhane, Maktouf, & Moalla, 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhao, R., Amanvermez, Y., Pei, J., Castro‐Ramirez, F., Rapsey, C., Garcia, C., Ebert, D. D., Haro, J. M., Fodor, L. A., David, O. A., et al. (2025) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.14145 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Abassi, B., Fekih-Romdhane, F., Maktouf, H., & Moalla, I.
- Affiliations
- Razi Hospital
- Venue
- European Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S393-S393
- ISSN
- 0924-9338
- 1778-3585
- PMC
- PMC9471307
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review