The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Patient's Primary Group
Abstract
The size and utilization of the primary group (those with whom one has interaction and commitment) was examined in 50 patients with non-psychotic psychiatric disorder and 50 matched controls. The hypotheses tested were that the patients would have a smaller size of primary group, less contact with its members and an inferior affective quality of interaction with it; and that this deficiency would be most marked in transactions with the principal attachment figure. Patients were found to spend the same amount of time as normals with their primary group, but proportionately more of that time was affectively unpleasant. They had fewer good friends and fewer contacts with persons outside the household. They had fewer attachment figures, almost one half of them reporting that either they had only one, or that they had had no recent contact with those alternatives that did exist. The majority of patients considered that their principal attachment figures gave them insufficient support. The complexity of interpreting these data is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment
Rever, G. W. (1972) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197211000-00011 · Cited by 8,446
Cited by
Thoits, P. A. (1982) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136511 · Cited by 1,507
Supportive interactions, negative interactions, and depressed mood
Schuster, T. L., Kessler, R. C., & Aseltine, R. H. (1990) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00938116 · Cited by 835
Social support as a contingency in psychological well-being
Turner, R. J. (1981) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136677 · Cited by 633
Measuring social relationships The Interview Schedule for Social Interaction
Henderson, S., Duncan-Jones, P., Byrne, D. G., & Scott, R. (1980) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329170005501x · Cited by 560
Self-citationThe Effect of Marital Status on Stage, Treatment, and Survival of Cancer Patients
Goodwin, J. S. (1987) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1987.03400210067027 · Cited by 543
Metadata
- Authors
- Henderson, S., Duncan-Jones, P., McAuley, H., & Ritchie, K.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 1978-01
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-86
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2948013061
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Patient's Primary Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1192/s0007125000283001
- The paper
- Henderson, S., Duncan-Jones, P., McAuley, H., & Ritchie, K. (1978). The Patient's Primary Group. British Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1192/s0007125000283001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.