Cited by 230Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAvian ecology and behavior

Song Function and the Evolution of Female Preferences: Why Birds Sing, Why Brains Matter

NOWICKI, STEPHEN, SEARCY, WILLIAM A.·2004·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A bstract : Analyzing the function of song and its evolution as a communication signal provides an essential backdrop for understanding the physiological and neural mechanisms responsible for song learning, perception, and production. The reverse also is true—understanding the mechanisms underlying song learning provides insight into how song has evolved as a communication signal. Song has two primary functions: to repel other males from a defended space and to attract females and stimulate their courtship. The developmental stress hypothesis we present here builds on studies of the development of the song system to suggest how learned features of song, including complexity and local dialect structure, can serve as indicators of male quality useful to females in mate choice. The link between song and male quality depends on the fact that brain structures underlying song learning largely develop during the first few months post‐hatching and that during this same period, songbirds are likely to be subject to nutritional and other developmental stresses. Individuals faring well in the face of stress are able to invest more resources to brain development and are expected to be correspondingly better at song learning. Learned features of song thus become reliable indicators of male quality, with reliability maintained by the developmental costs of song. Data from both field and laboratory studies are now beginning to provide broad support for the developmental stress hypothesis, illustrating the utility of connecting mechanistic and evolutionary analyses of song learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1298.012

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Song output is particularly sensitive to environmental factors.

    “Song output, finally, is perhaps the most energy-demanding trait, and thus particularly sensitive to environmental factors (e.g. food availability) [24,27].”

    From ‘Out of tune’: consequences of inbreeding on bird song (2016) · cites this paper as [24]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NOWICKI, S., & SEARCY, W. A.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
NOWICKI, STEPHEN
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06
Volume
1016
Issue
1
Pages
704-723
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2134428288
Cited by
230
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
bird song, song function, female mate choice, song learning, song dialects, song complexity, male quality, sexual selection, song perception, song production
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Communication, Choice Behavior, Female, Male, Models, Biological, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Territoriality, Vocalization, Animal, Songbirds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review