Song Function and the Evolution of Female Preferences: Why Birds Sing, Why Brains Matter
Abstract
A bstract : Analyzing the function of song and its evolution as a communication signal provides an essential backdrop for understanding the physiological and neural mechanisms responsible for song learning, perception, and production. The reverse also is true—understanding the mechanisms underlying song learning provides insight into how song has evolved as a communication signal. Song has two primary functions: to repel other males from a defended space and to attract females and stimulate their courtship. The developmental stress hypothesis we present here builds on studies of the development of the song system to suggest how learned features of song, including complexity and local dialect structure, can serve as indicators of male quality useful to females in mate choice. The link between song and male quality depends on the fact that brain structures underlying song learning largely develop during the first few months post‐hatching and that during this same period, songbirds are likely to be subject to nutritional and other developmental stresses. Individuals faring well in the face of stress are able to invest more resources to brain development and are expected to be correspondingly better at song learning. Learned features of song thus become reliable indicators of male quality, with reliability maintained by the developmental costs of song. Data from both field and laboratory studies are now beginning to provide broad support for the developmental stress hypothesis, illustrating the utility of connecting mechanistic and evolutionary analyses of song learning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Song output is particularly sensitive to environmental factors.
“Song output, finally, is perhaps the most energy-demanding trait, and thus particularly sensitive to environmental factors (e.g. food availability) [24,27].”
From ‘Out of tune’: consequences of inbreeding on bird song (2016) · cites this paper as [24]
Cites
Mate selection—A selection for a handicap
Zahavi, A. (1975) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3 · Cited by 5,251 · see citing works
S., N., W., S., & S., P. (2002) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00359-002-0361-3 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Nottebohm, F., Nottebohm, M. E., & Crane, L. (1986) · Behavioral and Neural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0163-1047(86)90485-1 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
‘Out of tune’: consequences of inbreeding on bird song
de Boer, R. A., Eens, M., & Müller, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.1142 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Animal calling behaviours and what this can tell us about the effects of changing soundscapes
Burnham, R. (2023) · Acoustics · doi:10.3390/acoustics5030039 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- NOWICKI, S., & SEARCY, W. A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- NOWICKI, STEPHEN
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 1016
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 704-723
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W2134428288
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Keywords
- bird song, song function, female mate choice, song learning, song dialects, song complexity, male quality, sexual selection, song perception, song production
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Communication, Choice Behavior, Female, Male, Models, Biological, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Territoriality, Vocalization, Animal, Songbirds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review