Cited by 100Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

Aging in Mouse and Human Systems: A Comparative Study

DEMETRIUS, LLOYD·2006·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Abstract: This article discusses the significance of mouse models as a basis for elucidating the aging process in humans. We identify certain parallels between mouse and human systems and review the theoretical and empirical support for the claim that the large divergence in the rate of aging between the two species resides in differences in the stability of their metabolic networks. We will show that these differences in metabolic stability have their origin in the different ecological constraints the species experience during their evolutionary history. We exploit these ideas to compare the effect of caloric restriction on murine and human systems. The studies predict that the large increases in mean life span and maximum life‐span potential observed in laboratory rodents subject to caloric restriction will not obtain in human populations. We predict that, in view of the different metabolic stability of the two systems, caloric restriction will have no effect on the maximum life‐span potential of humans, and a relatively minor effect on the mean life span of nonobese populations. This article thus points to certain intrinsic limitations in the use of mouse models in elucidating the aging process in humans. We furthermore contend the view that these limitations can be mitigated by considering the metabolic stability of the two species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1354.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 100

Authors
DEMETRIUS, L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
DEMETRIUS, LLOYD
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-05
Volume
1067
Issue
1
Pages
66-82
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W1980622574
Cited by
100
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
aging, mouse model, human aging, metabolic stability, metabolic networks, caloric restriction, maximum lifespan, ecological constraints, evolutionary history, cross-species comparison
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Basal Metabolism, Biological Evolution, Humans, Longevity, Entropy, Caloric Restriction, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review