Neural control of rhythmic sequences
Abstract
We investigated whether the temporal structure of movement sequences can be represented and learned independently of their ordinal structure, and whether some brain regions are particularly important for temporal sequence performance. Using a learning transfer design, we found evidence for independent temporal representations: learning a spatiotemporal sequence facilitated learning its temporal and ordinal structure alone; learning a temporal and an ordinal structure facilitated learning of a sequence where the two were coupled. Second, learning of temporal structures was found during reproduction of sequential stimuli with random ordinal structure, suggesting independent mechanisms for temporal learning. We then used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the neural control of sequences during well-learned performance. The temporal and ordinal structures of the sequences were varied in a 2 x 2 factorial design. A dissociation was found between brain regions involved in ordinal and temporal control, the latter mainly involving the presupplementary motor area, the inferior frontal gyrus and precentral sulcus, and the superior temporal gyri. Finally, in a second fMRI experiment, well-learned temporal sequences were performed with the left or right index fingers, or using rhythmic speech. The overlap in brain activity during performance with the different effectors included a similar set of brain regions as that found in the first fMRI experiment: the supplementary motor area (SMA), the superior temporal gyrus, and the inferior frontal cortex. We thus suggest that this set of regions is important for abstract, movement-independent, temporal sequence control. This organization may be important for increased flexibility in voluntarily timed motor tasks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The SMA-proper is associated with voluntary control of learnt motor sequences of both speech and finger movements.
“The motor function of the SMA-proper was re-iterated (Chung et al., 2005; Tremblay and Gracco, 2006; Alario et al., 2006) and associated with the voluntary control of learnt motor sequences of both speech and finger movements (Ullen et al., 2005).”
From A review and synthesis of the first 20years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading (2012) · cites this paper as Ullen et al., 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- ULLÉN, F., BENGTSSON, S. L., EHRSSON, H. H., & FORSSBERG, H.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Corresponding author
- ULLÉN, FREDRIK
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 1060
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 368-376
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W2098430009
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- temporal sequence learning, movement sequences, pre-supplementary motor area, inferior frontal gyrus, precentral sulcus, superior temporal gyrus, supplementary motor area, motor timing, effectors, rhythmic speech, transfer of learning, neural control of movement
- MeSH terms
- Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Motor Activity, Motor Skills, Neurons, Psychomotor Performance, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review