The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Do Salivary Antibodies Reliably Reflect Both Mucosal and Systemic Immunity?
Abstract
Abstract: Two major antibody classes operate in saliva: secretory IgA (SIgA) and IgG. The former is synthesized as dimeric IgA by plasma cells (PCs) in salivary glands and is exported by the polymeric Ig receptor (pIgR). Most IgG in saliva is derived from serum (mainly via gingival crevices), although some is locally produced. Gut‐associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) and nasopharynx‐associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) do not contribute equally to mucosal PCs throughout the body. Thus, enteric immunostimulation is an inadequate mode of stimulating salivary IgA antibodies, which are poorly associated with the intestinal SIgA response, for instance after enteric cholera vaccination. Nevertheless, the IgA response in submandibular/sublingual glands is better related to B cell induction in GALT than the parotid response. Such disparity is suggested by the elevated levels of IgA in submandibular secretions of AIDS patients, paralleling their highly upregulated intestinal IgA system. Moreover, in patients with active celiac disease, IgA antibodies to disease‐precipitating gliadin are reliably represented in whole saliva but not in parotid secretion. Parotid SIgA may be more consistently linked to immune induction in palatine tonsils and adenoids (human NALT), as supported by the homing molecule profile of NALT‐derived B cell blasts. Also several other variables influence the levels of antibodies in oral secretions. These include difficulties with reproducibility and standardization of immunoassays, the impact of flow rate, acute or chronic stress, protein loss during sample handling, and uncontrolled admixture of serum‐derived IgG and monomeric IgA. Despite such problems, saliva remains an interesting biological fluid with great scientific and clinical potentials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Accessing analytes in biofluids for peripheral biochemical monitoring
Heikenfeld, J., Jajack, A., Feldman, B., Granger, S. W., Gaitonde, S., Begtrup, G., & Katchman, B. A. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0040-3 · Cited by 758
Biological and psychological markers of stress in humans: Focus on the Trier Social Stress Test
Allen, A. P., Kennedy, P. J., Cryan, J. F., Dinan, T. G., & Clarke, G. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.11.005 · Cited by 734
Salivary flow patterns and the health of hard and soft oral tissues
Dawes, C. (2008) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0351 · Cited by 438
Sjögren, Y. M., Tomicic, S., Lundberg, A., Böttcher, M. F., Björkstén, B., Sverremark‐Ekström, E., & Jenmalm, M. C. (2009) · Clinical & Experimental Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03326.x · Cited by 337
Saliva-Based Biosensors: Noninvasive Monitoring Tool for Clinical Diagnostics
Malon, R. S. P., Sadir, S., Balakrishnan, M., & Córcoles, E. P. (2014) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2014/962903 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- BRANDTZAEG, P.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 1098
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 288-311
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W2104185120
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Salivary Antibodies Reliably Reflect Both Mucosal and Systemic Immunity? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1196/annals.1384.012
- The paper
- BRANDTZAEG, P. (2007). Do Salivary Antibodies Reliably Reflect Both Mucosal and Systemic Immunity? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1384.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.