Cited by 31Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchComplement system in diseases

Immune Complex Pathophysiology

NYDEGGER, URS E.·2007·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Abstract: Antigen–antibody (Ab) interactions that lead to the formation of immune complexes (ICs) are subtle biochemical processes determining health or disease according to the outcome. Good laboratory practice (GLP)‐acknowledged IC detection methods reveal that plasma levels of up to 15 μg/mL heat‐aggregated immunoglobulin G (IgG) equivalents are normal, indicating the physiological role of ICs. Among the major variables that influence the equilibrium association constant Ka, are specificity and epitope density of the antigen, Ig class/subclass of the Ab, IC complement (C)‐activating capacity, Fc receptor (FcR) interaction, and cytokine activation pattern. The Ka of antigen–Ab binding at ∼20°C ranges from low affinity (105) to high affinity (107–1011). Beneficial ICs serve to remove and/or neutralize infectious or toxic antigens, following an infectious attack in immune and vaccinated hosts. Circulating ICs are more prone for benefit than tissue‐bound ICs, which reflect in situ formation and/or undesired deposition in tissues due to overflow from insufficient reticuloendothelial system (RES) removal. The classical textbook topic on ICs still holds true but is under revision because of the improved knowledge of effector systems, such as C, cytokine, and FcR apparatus. Therapeutic options to treat IC‐associated diseases include intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) at their onset and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) directed at C activation products and/or cytokines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1398.009

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hypocomplementia is a hallmark of immune complex diseases, including interferon-driven conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus.

    “Hypocomplementia is a hallmark of immune complex diseases, a diverse group of inflammatory conditions characterized by antigen–antibody deposition and consequent complement activation64, including interferon-driven conditions such as SLE65.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NYDEGGER, U. E.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
NYDEGGER, URS E.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08
Volume
1109
Issue
1
Pages
66-83
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2030047834
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Complement system in diseases
Keywords
immune complexes, antigen-antibody reaction, binding constant, IgG, complement activation, Fc receptors, cytokines, reticuloendothelial system, tissue deposition, intravenous immunoglobulin, monoclonal antibodies
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigen-Antibody Complex, Arthus Reaction, Chemistry, Physical, Humans, Immune System Diseases, Protein Engineering, Cytokines, Chemical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review