Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 391

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 158 of the 158 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bisphosphonates: An Update on Mechanisms of Action and How These Relate to Clinical Efficacy

RUSSELL, R. GRAHAM G., XIA, ZHIDAO, DUNFORD, JAMES E., OPPERMANN, UDO, KWAASI, AARON, HULLEY, PHILIPPA A., KAVANAGH, KATHRYN L., TRIFFITT, JAMES T., LUNDY, MARK W., PHIPPS, ROGER J., BARNETT, BOBBY L., COXON, FRASER P., ROGERS, MICHAEL J., WATTS, NELSON B., EBETINO, FRANK H.·2007·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Abstract: The bisphosphonates (BPs) are well established as the treatments of choice for disorders of excessive bone resorption, including Paget's disease of bone, myeloma and bone metastases, and osteoporosis. There is considerable new knowledge about how BPs work. Their classical pharmacological effects appear to result from two key properties: their affinity for bone mineral and their inhibitory effects on osteoclasts. Mineral binding affinities differ among the clinically used BPs and may influence their differential distribution within bone, their biological potency, and their duration of action. The inhibitory effects of the nitrogen‐containing BPs (including alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and zoledronate) on osteoclasts appear to result from their inhibition of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS), a key branch‐point enzyme in the mevalonate pathway. FPPS generates isoprenoid lipids used for the posttranslational modification of small GTP‐binding proteins essential for osteoclast function. Effects on other cellular pathways, such as preventing apoptosis in osteocytes, are emerging as other potentially important mechanisms of action. As a class, BPs share several common properties. However, as with other classes of drugs, there are obvious chemical, biochemical, and pharmacological differences among the various individual BPs. Each BP has a unique profile that may help to explain potential important clinical differences among the BPs, in terms of speed of onset of fracture reduction, antifracture efficacy at different skeletal sites, and the degree and duration of suppression of bone turnover. As we approach the 40th anniversary of the discovery of their biological effects, there remain further opportunities for using their properties for medical purposes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1402.089

Cites

158 of 158 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 158 references

Cited by

See all 391

Metadata

Authors
RUSSELL, R. G. G., XIA, Z., DUNFORD, J. E., OPPERMANN, U., KWAASI, A., HULLEY, P. A., KAVANAGH, K. L., TRIFFITT, J. T., LUNDY, M. W., PHIPPS, R. J., BARNETT, B. L., COXON, F. P., ROGERS, M. J., WATTS, N. B., & EBETINO, F. H.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11
Volume
1117
Issue
1
Pages
209-257
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2029620076
Cited by
391
References
158
FWCI
14.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bisphosphonates: An Update on Mechanisms of Action and How These Relate to Clinical Efficacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1196/annals.1402.089
The paper
RUSSELL, R. G. G., XIA, Z., DUNFORD, J. E., OPPERMANN, U., KWAASI, A., HULLEY, P. A., KAVANAGH, K. L., TRIFFITT, J. T., LUNDY, M. W., PHIPPS, R. J., BARNETT, B. L., COXON, F. P., ROGERS, M. J., WATTS, N. B., & EBETINO, F. H. (2007). Bisphosphonates: An Update on Mechanisms of Action and How These Relate to Clinical Efficacy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1402.089

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.