A Meta‐analysis of Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Dyslexia
Abstract
Reading and phonological processing deficits have been the primary focus of neuroimaging studies addressing the neurologic basis of developmental dyslexia, but to date there has been no objective assessment of the consistency of these findings. To address this issue, spatial coordinates reported in the literature were submitted to two parallel activation likelihood estimate (ALE) meta‐analyses. First, a meta‐analysis including 96 foci from nine publications identified regions where typical readers are likely to show greater activation than dyslexics: two left extrastriate areas within BA 37, precuneus, inferior parietal cortex, superior temporal gyrus, thalamus, and left inferior frontal gyrus. Right hemisphere ALE foci representing hypoactivity in dyslexia were found in the fusiform, postcentral, and superior temporal gyri. To identify regions in which dyslexic subjects reliably show greater activation than controls, 75 foci from six papers were entered into a second meta‐analysis. Here ALE results revealed hyperactivity associated with dyslexia in right thalamus and anterior insula. These findings suggest that during the performance of a variety of reading tasks, normal readers activate left‐sided brain areas more than dyslexic readers do, whereas dyslexia is associated with greater right‐sided brain activity. The most robust result was in left extrastriate cortex, where hypoactivity associated with dyslexia was found. However, the ALE maps provided no support for cerebellar dysfunction, nor for hyperactivity in left frontal cortex in dyslexia, suggesting that these findings, unlike those described above, are likely to be more varied in terms of their reproducibility or spatial location.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some but not all child fMRI studies report atypical frontal cortex activation.
“Moreover, deviant patterns of activation in frontal cortex are reported in some but not all child fMRI studies (Maisog et al., 2008;Gabrieli, 2009).”
From Deviant processing of letters and speech sounds as proximate cause of reading failure: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of dyslexic children. (2010) · cites this paper as Maisog et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 109 · Cited by 337
- Authors
- Maisog, J. M., Einbinder, E. R., Flowers, D. L., Turkeltaub, P. E., & Eden, G. F.
- Affiliations
- Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
- University of Pennsylvania Health System (US)
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 1145
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 237-259
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W1986168401
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 109
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 2.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01hd036461-05)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH6500)
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD40095, HD36461, P50HD040095)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- developmental dyslexia, reading, phonological processing, hemispheric lateralization, extrastriate cortex, thalamus, anterior insula, cerebellar dysfunction
- MeSH terms
- Dyslexia, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Positron-Emission Tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review