The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Emergency Physician–Verified Out‐of‐hospital Intubation: Miss Rates by Paramedics
Abstract
Objectives: To prospectively quantify the number of unrecognized missed out‐of‐hospital intubations by ground paramedics using emergency physician verification as the criterion standard for verification of endotracheal tube placement. Methods:The authors performed an observational, prospective study of consecutive intubated patients arriving by ground emergency medical services to two urban teaching hospitals. Endotracheal tube placement was verified by emergency physicians and evaluated by using a combination of direct visualization, esophageal detector device (EDD), colorimetric end‐tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO 2), and physical examination. Results: During the six‐month study period, 208 out‐of‐hospital intubations by ground paramedics were enrolled, which included 160 (76.9%) medical patients and 48 (23.1%) trauma patients. A total of 12 (5.8%) endotracheal tubes were incorrectly placed outside the trachea. This comprised ten (6.3%) medical patients and two (4.2%) trauma patients. Of the 12 misplaced endotracheal tubes, a verification device (ETCO 2 or EDD) was used in three cases (25%) and not used in nine cases (75%). Conclusions: The rate of unrecognized, misplaced out‐of‐hospital intubations in this urban, midwestern setting was 5.8%. This is more consistent with results of prior out‐of‐hospital studies that used field verification and is discordant with the only other study to exclusively use emergency physician verification performed on arrival to the emergency department.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deakin, C. D., Nolan, J. P., Soar, J., Sunde, K., Koster, R. W., Smith, G. B., & Perkins, G. D. (2010) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.017 · Cited by 2,700
Neumar, R. W., Otto, C. W., Link, M. S., Kronick, S. L., Shuster, M., Callaway, C. W., Kudenchuk, P. J., Ornato, J. P., McNally, B., Silvers, S. M., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.110.970988 · Cited by 1,634
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015
Soar, J., Nolan, J. P., Böttiger, B. W., Perkins, G. D., Lott, C., Carli, P., Pellis, T., Sandroni, C., Skrifvars, M. B., Smith, G. B., et al. (2015) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.016 · Cited by 1,503
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 1. Executive summary
Nolan, J. P., Soar, J., Zideman, D. A., Biarent, D., Bossaert, L. L., Deakin, C., Koster, R. W., Wyllie, J., & Böttiger, B. (2010) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.021 · Cited by 1,375
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015
Perkins, G. D., Handley, A. J., Koster, R. W., Castrén, M., Smyth, M. A., Olasveengen, T., Monsieurs, K. G., Raffay, V., Gräsner, J.-T., Wenzel, V., et al. (2015) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.015 · Cited by 1,287
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, J. H., Murphy, M. P., Dickson, R. L., Somerville, G. G., & Brizendine, E. J.
- Venue
- Academic Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 707-709
- ISSN
- 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-2712
- OpenAlex
- W1991567056
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emergency Physician–Verified Out‐of‐hospital Intubation: Miss Rates by Paramedics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.026
- The paper
- Jones, J. H., Murphy, M. P., Dickson, R. L., Somerville, G. G., & Brizendine, E. J. (2004). Emergency Physician–Verified Out‐of‐hospital Intubation: Miss Rates by Paramedics. Academic Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.