The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Agreement, the F-Measure, and Reliability in Information Retrieval
Open accessAbstract
Information retrieval studies that involve searching the Internet or marking phrases usually lack a well-defined number of negative cases. This prevents the use of traditional interrater reliability metrics like the kappa statistic to assess the quality of expert-generated gold standards. Such studies often quantify system performance as precision, recall, and F-measure, or as agreement. It can be shown that the average F-measure among pairs of experts is numerically identical to the average positive specific agreement among experts and that kappa approaches these measures as the number of negative cases grows large. Positive specific agreement-or the equivalent F-measure-may be an appropriate way to quantify interrater reliability and therefore to assess the reliability of a gold standard in these studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Cited by
Chicco, D., & Jurman, G. (2020) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7 · Cited by 6,143
Savova, G. K., Masanz, J. J., Ogren, P. V., Zheng, J., Sohn, S., Kipper-Schuler, K. C., & Chute, C. G. (2010) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.2009.001560 · Cited by 1,967
NCBI disease corpus: A resource for disease name recognition and concept normalization
Doğan, R. I., Leaman, R., & Lu, Z. (2014) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2013.12.006 · Cited by 820
TVSum: Summarizing web videos using titles
Song, Y., Vallmitjana, J., Stent, A., & Jaimes, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7299154 · Cited by 623
Natural Language Processing in Oncology: A Review
Yim, W.-W., Yetisgen, M., Harris, W. P., & Kwan, S. W. (2016) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0213 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Hripcsak, G.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-01-31
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 296-298
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- OpenAlex
- W79139011
- Cited by
- 949
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agreement, the F-Measure, and Reliability in Information Retrieval. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1197/jamia.m1733
- The paper
- Hripcsak, G. (2005). Agreement, the F-Measure, and Reliability in Information Retrieval. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.m1733
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.