Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Calculus of M-Estimation

Open access
Stefanski, Leonard A, Boos, Dennis D·2002·The American Statistician

Abstract

Since the seminal papers by Huber in the 1960s, M-estimation methods (also known as estimating equation methods) have been increasingly important for asymptotic analysis and approximate inference. This article illustrates the breadth and generality of the M-estimation approach, thereby facilitating its use inpractice and in the classroom as a unifying approach to the study of large-sample inference.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1198/000313002753631330

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 466

Metadata

Authors
Stefanski, L. A., & Boos, D. D.
Venue
The American Statistician
Published
2002-02
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
29-38
ISSN
  • 0003-1305 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2731
OpenAlex
W2093130286
Cited by
466
References
1
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.