The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Lego System for Conditional Inference
Abstract
Conditioning on the observed data is an important and flexible design principle for statistical test procedures. Although generally applicable, permutation tests currently in use are limited to the treatment of special cases, such as contingency tables or K-sample problems. A new theoretical framework for permutation tests opens up the way to a unified and generalized view. This article argues that the transfer of such a theory to practical data analysis has important implications in many applications and requires tools that enable the data analyst to compute on the theoretical concepts as closely as possible. We reanalyze four datasets by adapting the general conceptual framework to these challenging inference problems and using the coin add-on package in the R system for statistical computing to show what one can gain from going beyond the “classical” test procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fisher, R. A. (1936) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.3923.554-a · Cited by 4,980
Edgington, E., Edgington, E., & Onghena, P. (2007) · doi:10.1201/9781420011814 · Cited by 2,030
Cited by
Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework
Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., & Zeileis, A. (2006) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1198/106186006x133933 · Cited by 4,021
Self-citationAn atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues
The FANTOM Consortium, Andersson, R., Gebhard, C., Miguel-Escalada, I., Hoof, I., Bornholdt, J., Boyd, M., Chen, Y., Zhao, X., Schmidl, C., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12787 · Cited by 2,550
Disentangling type 2 diabetes and metformin treatment signatures in the human gut microbiota
MetaHIT consortium, Forslund, K., Hildebrand, F., Nielsen, T., Falony, G., Le Chatelier, E., Sunagawa, S., Prifti, E., Vieira-Silva, S., Gudmundsdottir, V., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15766 · Cited by 2,116
TGFβ drives immune evasion in genetically reconstituted colon cancer metastasis
Tauriello, D. V. F., Palomo-Ponce, S., Stork, D., Berenguer-Llergo, A., Badia-Ramentol, J., Iglesias, M., Sevillano, M., Ibiza, S., Cañellas, A., Hernando-Momblona, X., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25492 · Cited by 1,851
Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Douaud, G., Beckmann, C. F., Glasser, M. F., Griffanti, L., & Smith, S. M. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.046 · Cited by 1,770
Metadata
- Authors
- Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., van de Wiel, M. A., & Zeileis, A.
- Venue
- The American Statistician
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-263
- ISSN
- 0003-1305 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2731
- OpenAlex
- W2055992413
- Cited by
- 892
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Lego System for Conditional Inference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/000313006x118430
- The paper
- Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., van de Wiel, M. A., & Zeileis, A. (2006). A Lego System for Conditional Inference. The American Statistician. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006x118430
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
