The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variable Selection for Gaussian Process Models in Computer Experiments
Abstract
In many situations, simulation of complex phenomena requires a large number of inputs and is computationally expensive. Identifying the inputs that most impact the system so that these factors can be further investigated can be a critical step in the scientific endeavor. In computer experiments, it is common to use a Gaussian spatial process to model the output of the simulator. In this article we introduce a new, simple method for identifying active factors in computer screening experiments. The approach is Bayesian and only requires the generation of a new inert variable in the analysis; however, in the spirit of frequentist hypothesis testing, the posterior distribution of the inert factor is used as a reference distribution against which the importance of the experimental factors can be assessed. The methodology is demonstrated on an application in material science, a computer experiment from the literature, and simulated examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Variable Selection via Gibbs Sampling
George, E. I., & McCulloch, R. E. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476353 · Cited by 2,828
Minimax and maximin distance designs
Johnson, M. E., Moore, L. M., & Ylvisaker, D. (1990) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/0378-3758(90)90122-b · Cited by 1,451
Cited by
Perspectives on the integration between first-principles and data-driven modeling
Bradley, W., Kim, J., Kilwein, Z., Blakely, L., Eydenberg, M., Jalvin, J., Laird, C., & Boukouvala, F. (2022) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107898 · Cited by 231
Metadata
- Authors
- Linkletter, C., Bingham, D., Hengartner, N., Higdon, D., & Ye, K. Q.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 478-490
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2723
- OpenAlex
- W1977715424
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variable Selection for Gaussian Process Models in Computer Experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/004017006000000228
- The paper
- Linkletter, C., Bingham, D., Hengartner, N., Higdon, D., & Ye, K. Q. (2006). Variable Selection for Gaussian Process Models in Computer Experiments. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1198/004017006000000228
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.