Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Overcoming Scale Usage Heterogeneity: A Bayesian Hierarchical Approach

Rossi, Peter E, Gilula, Zvi, Allenby, Greg M·2001·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

Questions that use a discrete ratings scale are commonplace in survey research. Examples in marketing include customer satisfaction measurement and purchase intention. Survey research practitioners have long commented that respondents vary in their usage of the scale: Common patterns include using only the middle of the scale or using the upper or lower end. These differences in scale usage can impart biases to correlation and regression analyses. To capture scale usage differences, we developed a new model with individual scale and location effects and a discrete outcome variable. We model the joint distribution of all ratings scale responses rather than specific univariate conditional distributions as in the ordinal probit model. We apply our model to a customer satisfaction survey and show that the correlation inferences are much different once proper adjustments are made for the discreteness of the data and scale usage. We also show that our adjusted or latent ratings scale is more closely related to actual purchase behavior.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1198/016214501750332668

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Rossi, P. E., Gilula, Z., & Allenby, G. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
2001-03
Volume
96
Issue
453
Pages
20-31
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2051779164
Cited by
197
References
0
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overcoming Scale Usage Heterogeneity: A Bayesian Hierarchical Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/016214501750332668
The paper
Rossi, P. E., Gilula, Z., & Allenby, G. M. (2001). Overcoming Scale Usage Heterogeneity: A Bayesian Hierarchical Approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214501750332668

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.