The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Overcoming Scale Usage Heterogeneity: A Bayesian Hierarchical Approach
Abstract
Questions that use a discrete ratings scale are commonplace in survey research. Examples in marketing include customer satisfaction measurement and purchase intention. Survey research practitioners have long commented that respondents vary in their usage of the scale: Common patterns include using only the middle of the scale or using the upper or lower end. These differences in scale usage can impart biases to correlation and regression analyses. To capture scale usage differences, we developed a new model with individual scale and location effects and a discrete outcome variable. We model the joint distribution of all ratings scale responses rather than specific univariate conditional distributions as in the ordinal probit model. We apply our model to a customer satisfaction survey and show that the correlation inferences are much different once proper adjustments are made for the discreteness of the data and scale usage. We also show that our adjusted or latent ratings scale is more closely related to actual purchase behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Weijters, B., Cabooter, E., & Schillewaert, N. (2010) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.004 · Cited by 801
Do Intentions Really Predict Behavior? Self-Generated Validity Effects in Survey Research
Chandon, P., Morwitz, V. G., & Reinartz, W. J. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.69.2.1.60755 · Cited by 656
Hu, N., Koh, N. S., & Reddy, S. K. (2014) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.07.009 · Cited by 406
The analysis of ordered categorical data: An overview and a survey of recent developments
Liu, I., & Agresti, A. (2005) · Test · doi:10.1007/bf02595397 · Cited by 301
de Jong, M. G., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., Fox, J.-P., & Baumgartner, H. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.1.104 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Rossi, P. E., Gilula, Z., & Allenby, G. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 453
- Pages
- 20-31
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2051779164
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overcoming Scale Usage Heterogeneity: A Bayesian Hierarchical Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/016214501750332668
- The paper
- Rossi, P. E., Gilula, Z., & Allenby, G. M. (2001). Overcoming Scale Usage Heterogeneity: A Bayesian Hierarchical Approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214501750332668
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.