The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marginal Likelihood From the Metropolis–Hastings Output
Abstract
This article provides a framework for estimating the marginal likelihood for the purpose of Bayesian model comparisons. The approach extends and completes the method presented in Chib (1995) by overcoming the problems associated with the presence of intractable full conditional densities. The proposed method is developed in the context of MCMC chains produced by the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm, whose building blocks are used both for sampling and marginal likelihood estimation, thus economizing on prerun tuning effort and programming. Experiments involving the logit model for binary data, hierarchical random effects model for clustered Gaussian data, Poisson regression model for clustered count data, and the multivariate probit model for correlated binary data, are used to illustrate the performance and implementation of the method. These examples demonstrate that the method is practical and widely applicable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 · Cited by 6,606
Cited by
(2013) · Cited by 1,351
Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage–Dickey method
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lodewyckx, T., Kuriyal, H., & Grasman, R. (2010) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.001 · Cited by 740
Computing Bayes factors using thermodynamic integration.
Lartillot, N., & Philippe, H. (2006) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150500433722 · Cited by 668
Smooth Skyride through a Rough Skyline: Bayesian Coalescent-Based Inference of Population Dynamics
Minin, V. N., Bloomquist, E. W., & Suchard, M. A. (2008) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msn090 · Cited by 697
MCMCpack: Markov Chain Monte Carlo in R
Martin, A. D., Quinn, K. M., & Park, J. H. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v042.i09 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Chib, S., & Jeliazkov, I.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 453
- Pages
- 270-281
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2008205728
- Cited by
- 1,062
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marginal Likelihood From the Metropolis–Hastings Output. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/016214501750332848
- The paper
- Chib, S., & Jeliazkov, I. (2001). Marginal Likelihood From the Metropolis–Hastings Output. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214501750332848
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.