The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Note on the Efficiency of Sandwich Covariance Matrix Estimation
Abstract
The sandwich estimator, also known as robust covariance matrix estimator, heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimate, or empirical covariance matrix estimator, has achieved increasing use in the econometric literature as well as with the growing popularity of generalized estimating equations. Its virtue is that it provides consistent estimates of the covariance matrix for parameter estimates even when the fitted parametric model fails to hold or is not even specified. Surprisingly though, there has been little discussion of properties of the sandwich method other than consistency. We investigate the sandwich estimator in quasi-likelihood models asymptotically, and in the linear case analytically. We show that under certain circumstances when the quasi-likelihood model is correct, the sandwich estimate is often far more variable than the usual parametric variance estimate. The increased variance is a fixed feature of the method and the price that one pays to obtain consistency even when the parametric model fails or when there is heteroscedasticity. We show that the additional variability directly affects the coverage probability of confidence intervals constructed from sandwich variance estimates. In fact, the use of sandwich variance estimates combined with t-distribution quantiles gives confidence intervals with coverage probability falling below the nominal value. We propose an adjustment to compensate for this fact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009) · doi:10.1515/9781400829828 · Cited by 9,467
Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference With Clustered Errors
Cameron, A. C., Gelbach, J. B., & Miller, D. L. (2008) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.90.3.414 · Cited by 4,417
Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments
Murray, D. M., Varnell, S. P., & Blitstein, J. L. (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.3.423 · Cited by 677
The empirical structure of narrative identity: The initial Big Three
McLean, K. C., Syed, M., Pasupathi, M., Adler, J. M., Dunlop, W. L., Drustrup, D., Fivush, R., Graci, M. E., Lilgendahl, J. P., Lodi-Smith, J., et al. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000247 · Cited by 358
Communalism, familism, and filial piety: are they birds of a collectivist feather?
Schwartz, S. J., Weisskirch, R. S., Hurley, E. A., Zamboanga, B. L., Park, I. J. K., Kim, S. Y., Umaña-Taylor, A., Castillo, L. G., Brown, E., & Greene, A. D. (2010) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021370 · Cited by 279
Bias and consistency in three-way gravity models
Weidner, M., & Zylkin, T. (2021) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2021.103513 · Cited by 201
Improving propensity score estimators’ robustness to model misspecification using super learner.
Pirracchio, R., Petersen, M. L., & van der Laan, M. (2015) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwu253 · Cited by 186
Kahan, B. C., Forbes, G., Ali, Y., Jairath, V., Bremner, S., Harhay, M. O., Hooper, R., Wright, N., Eldridge, S. M., & Leyrat, C. (2016) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1571-2 · Cited by 185
A comparison of two bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations
Lu, B., Preisser, J. S., Qaqish, B. F., Suchindran, C., Bangdiwala, S. I., & Wolfson, M. (2007) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00764.x · Cited by 118
Schwartz, S. J., Unger, J. B., Rosiers, S. E. D., Huang, S., Baezconde-Garbanati, L., Lorenzo-Blanco, E. I., Villamar, J. A., Soto, D. W., Pattarroyo, M., & Szapocznik, J. (2012) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.020 · Cited by 100
Cluster randomized trials with treatment noncompliance.
Jo, B., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B. O., Ialongo, N. S., & Brown, C. H. (2008) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.13.1.1 · Cited by 83
Acculturation and Well-Being Among College Students From Immigrant Families
Schwartz, S. J., Waterman, A. S., UmañaTaylor, A. J., Lee, R. M., Kim, S. Y., Vazsonyi, A. T., Huynh, Q., Whitbourne, S. K., Park, I. J. K., Hudson, M., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.21847 · Cited by 83
Meca, A., Sabet, R. F., Farrelly, C. M., Benitez, C. G., Schwartz, S. J., Gonzales-Backen, M., Lorenzo-Blanco, E. I., Unger, J. B., Zamboanga, B. L., Baezconde-Garbanati, L., et al. (2017) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/cdp0000129 · Cited by 79
Burgio, K. L., Williams, B. R., Dionne-Odom, J. N., Redden, D. T., Noh, H., Goode, P. S., Kvale, E., Bakitas, M., & Bailey, F. A. (2016) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2015.0311 · Cited by 41
Stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: a methodological overview
Li, F., & Wang, R. (2022) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.136 · Cited by 37
Linear and Non-Linear Regression Methods in Epidemiology and Biostatistics
Vittinghoff, E., McCulloch, C. E., Glidden, D. V., & Shiboski, S. C. (2011) · Essential Statistical Methods for Medical Statistics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53737-9.50006-2 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Kauermann, G., & Carroll, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 456
- Pages
- 1387-1396
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2148678270
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
