The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Penalized Spline Estimation for Partially Linear Single-Index Models
Abstract
Single-index models are potentially important tools for multivariate nonparametric regression. They generalize linear regression by replacing the linear combination α0Tx with a nonparametric component, η0(α0Tx), where η0(·) is an unknown univariate link function. By reducing the dimensionality from that of a general covariate vector x to a univariate index α0Tx, single-index models avoid the so-called “curse of dimensionality.” We propose penalized spline (P-spline) estimation of η0(·) in partially linear single-index models, where the mean function has the form η0(α0Tx) + β 0Tz. The P-spline approach offers a number of advantages over other fitting methods for single-index models. All parameters in the P-spline single-index model can be estimated simultaneously by penalized nonlinear least squares. As a direct least squares fitting method, our approach is rapid and computationally stable. Standard nonlinear least squares software can be used. Moreover, joint inference for η0(·), α0, and β0 is possible by standard estimating equations theory such as the sandwich formula for the joint covariance matrix. Using asymptotics where the number of knots is fixed, though potentially large, we show √n consistency and asymptotic normality of the estimators of all parameters. These asymptotic results permit joint inference for the parameters. Several examples illustrate that the model and proposed estimation methodology can be effective in practice. We investigate inference based on the sandwich estimate through a Monte Carlo study. GeneralLq penalty functions can be readily implemented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
(2005) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/0-387-27255-0_9 · Cited by 20,133
(2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s303 · Cited by 17,923
de Boor, C. (1978) · Applied Mathematical Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-6333-3 · Cited by 11,944
Brown, R. A., Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1991) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532174 · Cited by 8,176
(1967) · Project Euclid (Cornell University) · Cited by 4,720
Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications
Bates, D. M., & Watts, D. G. (1988) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316757 · Cited by 3,979
Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties
Eilers, P. H. C., & Marx, B. D. (1996) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1038425655 · Cited by 3,666
Ridge Regression: Applications to Nonorthogonal Problems
Hoerl, A. E., & Kennard, R. W. (1970) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1970.10488635 · Cited by 2,956
Friedman, J. H., & Stuetzle, W. (1981) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1981.10477729 · Cited by 2,216
Cited by
Mu, D., Jiang, J., & Zhang, C. (2013) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en6052583 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, Y., & Ruppert, D.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 460
- Pages
- 1042-1054
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1969640518
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Penalized Spline Estimation for Partially Linear Single-Index Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/016214502388618861
- The paper
- Yu, Y., & Ruppert, D. (2002). Penalized Spline Estimation for Partially Linear Single-Index Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214502388618861
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.