The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Boosting With the L2Loss: Regression and Classification
Abstract
This article investigates a computationally simple variant of boosting, L2Boost, which is constructed from a functional gradient descent algorithm with the L2-loss function. Like other boosting algorithms, L2Boost uses many times in an iterative fashion a prechosen fitting method, called the learner. Based on the explicit expression of refitting of residuals of L2Boost, the case with (symmetric) linear learners is studied in detail in both regression and classification. In particular, with the boosting iteration m working as the smoothing or regularization parameter, a new exponential bias-variance trade-off is found with the variance (complexity) term increasing very slowly as m tends to infinity. When the learner is a smoothing spline, an optimal rate of convergence result holds for both regression and classification and the boosted smoothing spline even adapts to higher-order, unknown smoothness. Moreover, a simple expansion of a (smoothed) 0–1 loss function is derived to reveal the importance of the decision boundary, bias reduction, and impossibility of an additive bias-variance decomposition in classification. Finally, simulation and real dataset results are obtained to demonstrate the attractiveness of L2Boost. In particular, we demonstrate that L2Boosting with a novel component-wise cubic smoothing spline is both practical and effective in the presence of high-dimensional predictors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731
The Strength of Weak Learnability
Schapire, R. E. (1990) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116037 · Cited by 4,600
Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma
Geman, S., Bienenstock, E., & Doursat, R. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.1.1 · Cited by 3,578 · cited 2×
“…there is even more \resistance against over(cid:12)tting" in classi(cid:12)cation than regression and why previous attempts were not successful at decomposing the test set (generalization) error into additive bias and variance terms (cf. Geman et al. 1992; Breiman, 1998, and references therein).”
BackgroundBoosting a Weak Learning Algorithm by Majority
Freund, Y. (1995) · Information and Computation · doi:10.1006/inco.1995.1136 · Cited by 1,674
Cited by
Strobl, C., Malley, J., & Tutz, G. (2009) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0016973 · Cited by 2,583
Reconciling modern machine-learning practice and the classical bias–variance trade-off
Belkin, M., Hsu, D., Ma, S., & Mandal, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1903070116 · Cited by 1,595
McCaffrey, D. F., Ridgeway, G., & Morral, A. R. (2004) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.9.4.403 · Cited by 1,317
The Rhetoric and Reality of Anthropomorphism in Artificial Intelligence
Watson, D. (2019) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-019-09506-6 · Cited by 148
Empirical Asset Pricing via Machine Learning
Gu, S., Kelly, B. T., & Xiu, D. (2018) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3159577 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Bühlmann, P., & Yu, B.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 462
- Pages
- 324-339
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2088883866
- Cited by
- 845
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Boosting With the L2Loss: Regression and Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/016214503000125
- The paper
- Bühlmann, P., & Yu, B. (2003). Boosting With the L2Loss: Regression and Classification. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214503000125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.