Cited by 1,595Advanced Statistical Methods and ModelsStatistical Methods and ApplicationsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Functional Data Analysis for Sparse Longitudinal Data

Yao, Fang, Müller, Hans-Georg, Wang, Jane-Ling·2005·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

We propose a nonparametric method to perform functional principal components analysis for the case of sparse longitudinal data. The method aims at irregularly spaced longitudinal data, where the number of repeated measurements available per subject is small. In contrast, classical functional data analysis requires a large number of regularly spaced measurements per subject. We assume that the repeated measurements are located randomly with a random number of repetitions for each subject and are determined by an underlying smooth random (subject-specific) trajectory plus measurement errors. Basic elements of our approach are the parsimonious estimation of the covariance structure and mean function of the trajectories, and the estimation of the variance of the measurement errors. The eigenfunction basis is estimated from the data, and functional principal components score estimates are obtained by a conditioning step. This conditional estimation method is conceptually simple and straightforward to implement. A key step is the derivation of asymptotic consistency and distribution results under mild conditions, using tools from functional analysis. Functional data analysis for sparse longitudinal data enables prediction of individual smooth trajectories even if only one or few measurements are available for a subject. Asymptotic pointwise and simultaneous confidence bands are obtained for predicted individual trajectories, based on asymptotic distributions, for simultaneous bands under the assumption of a finite number of components. Model selection techniques, such as the Akaike information criterion, are used to choose the model dimension corresponding to the number of eigenfunctions in the model. The methods are illustrated with a simulation study, longitudinal CD4 data for a sample of AIDS patients, and time-course gene expression data for the yeast cell cycle.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1198/016214504000001745

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yao, F., Müller, H.-G., & Wang, J.-L.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
2005-06
Volume
100
Issue
470
Pages
577-590
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2144148350
Cited by
1,595
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 102 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 137 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 43
FWCI
17.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
functional principal component analysis, sparse longitudinal data, nonparametric covariance estimation, mean function estimation, asymptotic consistency, simultaneous confidence bands, model selection, Akaike information criterion, CD4 count, AIDS

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review