Functional Data Analysis for Sparse Longitudinal Data
Abstract
We propose a nonparametric method to perform functional principal components analysis for the case of sparse longitudinal data. The method aims at irregularly spaced longitudinal data, where the number of repeated measurements available per subject is small. In contrast, classical functional data analysis requires a large number of regularly spaced measurements per subject. We assume that the repeated measurements are located randomly with a random number of repetitions for each subject and are determined by an underlying smooth random (subject-specific) trajectory plus measurement errors. Basic elements of our approach are the parsimonious estimation of the covariance structure and mean function of the trajectories, and the estimation of the variance of the measurement errors. The eigenfunction basis is estimated from the data, and functional principal components score estimates are obtained by a conditioning step. This conditional estimation method is conceptually simple and straightforward to implement. A key step is the derivation of asymptotic consistency and distribution results under mild conditions, using tools from functional analysis. Functional data analysis for sparse longitudinal data enables prediction of individual smooth trajectories even if only one or few measurements are available for a subject. Asymptotic pointwise and simultaneous confidence bands are obtained for predicted individual trajectories, based on asymptotic distributions, for simultaneous bands under the assumption of a finite number of components. Model selection techniques, such as the Akaike information criterion, are used to choose the model dimension corresponding to the number of eigenfunctions in the model. The methods are illustrated with a simulation study, longitudinal CD4 data for a sample of AIDS patients, and time-course gene expression data for the yeast cell cycle.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FDA methods determine curve shape empirically.
“FDA methods determine curve shape empirically 22,35”
From Attention to eyes is present but in decline in 2–6-month-old infants later diagnosed with autism (2013) · cites this paper as [22]
PACE characterizes statistical ensembles of irregularly-sampled longitudinal data in terms of entire curve shapes on the basis of conditional expectation.
“PACE characterizes statistical ensembles of irregularly-sampled longitudinal data in terms of entire curve shapes on the basis of conditional expectation.”
From Attention to eyes is present but in decline in 2–6-month-old infants later diagnosed with autism (2013) · cites this paper as [22]
The PACE method of FDA is designed specifically to overcome non-uniform sampling, particularly in the case of missing values.
“The PACE method of FDA is also designed specifically to overcome a common problem for longitudinal studies: non-uniform sampling particularly in the case of missing values 22,35 .”
From Attention to eyes is present but in decline in 2–6-month-old infants later diagnosed with autism (2013) · cites this paper as [22]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Attention to eyes is present but in decline in 2–6-month-old infants later diagnosed with autism
Jones, W., & Klin, A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12715 · Cited by 1,293 · see citing works
Region-Specific Proteome Changes of the Intestinal Epithelium during Aging and Dietary Restriction
Gebert, N., Cheng, C.-W., Kirkpatrick, J. M., Di Fraia, D., Yun, J., Schädel, P., Pace, S., Garside, G. B., Werz, O., Rudolph, K. L., et al. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107565 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Li, K., O'Brien, R., Lutz, M., Luo, S., & Initiative, T. A. D. N. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2017.11.004 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Huang, Q., Zou, X., Lian, Z., Zhou, X., Han, X., Luo, Y., Chen, S., Wang, Y., Wu, S., & Ji, L. (2025) · Cardiovascular Diabetology · doi:10.1186/s12933-025-02611-0 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
CellDrift: inferring perturbation responses in temporally sampled single-cell data
Jin, K., Schnell, D., Li, G., Salomonis, N., Prasath, V. B. S., Szczesniak, R., & Aronow, B. J. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac324 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yao, F., Müller, H.-G., & Wang, J.-L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 470
- Pages
- 577-590
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2144148350
- Cited by
- 1,595
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 102 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 137 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 17.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- functional principal component analysis, sparse longitudinal data, nonparametric covariance estimation, mean function estimation, asymptotic consistency, simultaneous confidence bands, model selection, Akaike information criterion, CD4 count, AIDS
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review