The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical Analysis of a Telephone Call Center: A Queueing-Science Perspective
Abstract
A call center is a service network in which agents provide telephone-based services. Customers who seek these services are delayed in tele-queues. This article summarizes an analysis of a unique record of call center operations. The data comprise a complete operational history of a small banking call center, call by call, over a full year. Taking the perspective of queueing theory, we decompose the service process into three fundamental components: arrivals, customer patience, and service durations. Each component involves different basic mathematical structures and requires a different style of statistical analysis. Some of the key empirical results are sketched, along with descriptions of the varied techniques required. Several statistical techniques are developed for analysis of the basic components. One of these techniques is a test that a point process is a Poisson process. Another involves estimation of the mean function in a nonparametric regression with lognormal errors. A new graphical technique is introduced for nonparametric hazard rate estimation with censored data. Models are developed and implemented for forecasting of Poisson arrival rates. Finally, the article surveys how the characteristics deduced from the statistical analyses form the building blocks for theoretically interesting and practically useful mathematical models for call center operations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
The transformation of poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data
ANSCOMBE, F. J. (1948) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/35.3-4.246 · Cited by 1,300
Cited by
Federated Learning With Blockchain for Autonomous Vehicles: Analysis and Design Challenges
Pokhrel, S. R., & Choi, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2020.2990686 · Cited by 531
When Does the Devil Make Work? An Empirical Study of the Impact of Workload on Worker Productivity
Tan, T. F., & Netessine, S. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.1950 · Cited by 297
An Emergency Department Patient Flow Model Based on Queueing Theory Principles
Wiler, J. L., Bolandifar, E., Griffey, R. T., Poirier, R. F., & Olsen, T. (2013) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/acem.12215 · Cited by 69
Testing the Validity of a Demand Model: An Operations Perspective
Besbes, O., Phillips, R., & Zeevi, A. (2010) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.1090.0264 · Cited by 47
Sobral, F., Chambel, M. J., & Castanheira, F. (2019) · Economic and Industrial Democracy · doi:10.1177/0143831x16648386 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, L., Gans, N., Mandelbaum, A., Sakov, A., Shen, H., Zeltyn, S., & Zhao, L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 469
- Pages
- 36-50
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2039698234
- Cited by
- 802
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 67.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.