The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inference in Curved Exponential Family Models for Networks
Abstract
Network data arise in a wide variety of applications. Although descriptive statistics for networks abound in the literature, the science of fitting statistical models to complex network data is still in its infancy. The models considered in this article are based on exponential families; therefore, we refer to them as exponential random graph models (ERGMs). Although ERGMs are easy to postulate, maximum likelihood estimation of parameters in these models is very difficult. In this article, we first review the method of maximum likelihood estimation using Markov chain Monte Carlo in the context of fitting linear ERGMs. We then extend this methodology to the situation where the model comes from a curved exponential family. The curved exponential family methodology is applied to new specifications of ERGMs, proposed in an earlier article, having nonlinear parameters to represent structural properties of networks such as transitivity and heterogeneity of degrees. We review the difficult topic of implementing likelihood ratio tests for these models, then apply all these model-fitting and testing techniques to the estimation of linear and nonlinear parameters for a collaboration network between partners in a New England law firm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Stochastic Approximation Method
Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729586 · Cited by 9,643
Cited by
Comparing Brain Networks of Different Size and Connectivity Density Using Graph Theory
van Wijk, B. C. M., Stam, C. J., & Daffertshofer, A. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013701 · Cited by 1,161
Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks
Robins, G., Snijders, T., Wang, P., Handcock, M., & Pattison, P. (2007) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2006.08.003 · Cited by 832
Self-citationA Survey of Statistical Network Models
Goldenberg, A., Zheng, A. X., Fienberg, S. E., & Airoldi, E. M. (2010) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000005 · Cited by 819
Goodness of Fit of Social Network Models
Hunter, D. R., Goodreau, S. M., & Handcock, M. S. (2008) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214507000000446 · Cited by 689
Self-citation4. A Relational Event Framework for Social Action
Butts, C. T. (2008) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2008.00203.x · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Hunter, D. R., & Handcock, M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 565-583
- ISSN
- 1061-8600 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2715
- OpenAlex
- W2155910443
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inference in Curved Exponential Family Models for Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/106186006x133069
- The paper
- Hunter, D. R., & Handcock, M. S. (2006). Inference in Curved Exponential Family Models for Networks. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006x133069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.