Nonparametric prediction in measurement error models
Open accessAbstract
Predicting the value of a variable Y corresponding to a future value of an explanatory variable X, based on a sample of previously observed independent data pairs (X1, Y1), …, (Xn, Yn) distributed like (X, Y), is very important in statistics. In the error-free case, where X is observed accurately, this problem is strongly related to that of standard regression estimation, since prediction of Y can be achieved via estimation of the regression curve E(Y|X). When the observed Xis and the future observation of X are measured with error, prediction is of a quite different nature. Here, if T denotes the future (contaminated) available version of X, prediction of Y can be achieved via estimation of E(Y|T). In practice, estimating E(Y|T) can be quite challenging, as data may be collected under different conditions, making the measurement errors on Xi and X nonidentically distributed. We take up this problem in the nonparametric setting and introduce estimators which allow a highly adaptive approach to smoothing. Reflecting the complexity of the problem, optimal rates of convergence of estimators can vary from the semiparametric n−1/2 rate to much slower rates that are characteristic of nonparametric problems. Nevertheless, we are able to develop highly adaptive, data-driven methods that achieve very good performance in practice. This article has the supplementary materials online. Acknowledgments: Carroll's research was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (CA57030, CA104620). Delaigle's work was partially supported by a fellowship from the Maurice Belz foundation. Hall's work was partially supported by the Australian Reserach Council and by a grant from the National Science Foundation (DMS 0604698).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Measurement error may not be transportable across various settings.
“Moreover, measurement error may not be transportable across various settings [29].”
From A calibration hierarchy for risk models was defined: from utopia to empirical data (2016) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 51
- Authors
- Carroll, R. J., Delaigle, A., & Hall, P.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 487
- Pages
- 993-1003
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- PMC
- PMC2864536
- OpenAlex
- W1992854008
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r37ca057030-23)
- National Cancer Institute ((R37-CA057030))
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Keywords
- nonparametric prediction, measurement error models, conditional mean estimation, adaptive smoothing, optimal convergence rates, semiparametric regression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review