The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regularization Parameter Selections via Generalized Information Criterion
Open accessAbstract
We apply the nonconcave penalized likelihood approach to obtain variable selections as well as shrinkage estimators. This approach relies heavily on the choice of regularization parameter, which controls the model complexity. In this paper, we propose employing the generalized information criterion (GIC), encompassing the commonly used Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC), for selecting the regularization parameter. Our proposal makes a connection between the classical variable selection criteria and the regularization parameter selections for the nonconcave penalized likelihood approaches. We show that the BIC-type selector enables identification of the true model consistently, and the resulting estimator possesses the oracle property in the terminology of Fan and Li (2001). In contrast, however, the AIC-type selector tends to overfit with positive probability. We further show that the AIC-type selector is asymptotically loss efficient, while the BIC-type selector is not. Our simulation results confirm these theoretical findings, and an empirical example is presented. Some technical proofs are given in the online supplementary material.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties
Zou, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000735 · Cited by 7,470
Craven, P., & Wahba, G. (1978) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf01404567 · Cited by 3,388
Cited by
Desai, R. J., Wang, S. V., Vaduganathan, M., Evers, T., & Schneeweiss, S. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18962 · Cited by 292
Tuning Parameter Selection in High Dimensional Penalized Likelihood
Fan, Y., & Tang, C. Y. (2013) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/rssb.12001 · Cited by 256
Lassopack: model selection and prediction with regularized regression in Stata
Ahrens, A., Hansen, C. B., & Schaffer, M. E. (2020) · The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x20909697 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Li, R., & Tsai, C.-L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-03-01
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 489
- Pages
- 312-323
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2007568722
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regularization Parameter Selections via Generalized Information Criterion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08013
- The paper
- Zhang, Y., Li, R., & Tsai, C.-L. (2010). Regularization Parameter Selections via Generalized Information Criterion. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.