The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improved Inference for Respondent-Driven Sampling Data With Application to HIV Prevalence Estimation
Open accessAbstract
Respondent-driven sampling is a form of link-tracing network sampling, which is widely used to study hard-to-reach populations, often to estimate population proportions. Previous treatments of this process have used a with-replacement approximation, which we show induces bias in estimates for large sample fractions and differential network connectedness by characteristic of interest. We present a treatment of respondent-driven sampling as a successive sampling process. Unlike existing representations, our approach respects the essential without-replacement feature of the process, while converging to an existing with-replacement representation for small sample fractions, and to the sample mean for a full-population sample. We present a successive-sampling based estimator for population means based on respondent-driven sampling data, and demonstrate its superior performance when the size of the hidden population is known. We present sensitivity analyses for unknown population sizes. In addition, we note that like other existing estimators, our new estimator is subject to bias induced by the selection of the initial sample. Using data collected among three populations in two countries, we illustrate the application of this approach to populations with varying characteristics. We conclude that the successive sampling estimator improves on existing estimators, and can also be used as a diagnostic tool when population size is not known. This article has supplementary material online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Random walks and diffusion on networks
Masuda, N., Porter, M. A., & Lambiotte, R. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.07.007 · Cited by 657
Network Sampling: From Snowball and Multiplicity to Respondent-Driven Sampling
Heckathorn, D. D., & Cameron, C. J. (2017) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053556 · Cited by 307
Concepts, Definitions and Data Collection Approaches
Bilsborrow, R. E. (2016) · International Handbooks of Population · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7282-2_7 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Gile, K. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 493
- Pages
- 135-146
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2016166050
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Inference for Respondent-Driven Sampling Data With Application to HIV Prevalence Estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/jasa.2011.ap09475
- The paper
- Gile, K. J. (2011). Improved Inference for Respondent-Driven Sampling Data With Application to HIV Prevalence Estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2011.ap09475
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.