The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outlier Detection Using Nonconvex Penalized Regression
Open accessAbstract
This article studies the outlier detection problem from the standpoint of penalized regression. In the regression model, we add one mean shift parameter for each of the n data points. We then apply a regularization favoring a sparse vector of mean shift parameters. The usual L1 penalty yields a convex criterion, but fails to deliver a robust estimator. The L1 penalty corresponds to soft thresholding. We introduce a thresholding (denoted by Θ) based iterative procedure for outlier detection (Θ–IPOD). A version based on hard thresholding correctly identifies outliers on some hard test problems. We describe the connection between Θ–IPOD and M-estimators. Our proposed method has one tuning parameter with which to both identify outliers and estimate regression coefficients. A data-dependent choice can be made based on the Bayes information criterion. The tuned Θ–IPOD shows outstanding performance in identifying outliers in various situations compared with other existing approaches. In addition, Θ–IPOD is much faster than iteratively reweighted least squares for large data, because each iteration costs at most O(np) (and sometimes much less), avoiding an O(np2) least squares estimate. This methodology can be extended to high-dimensional modeling with p ≫ n if both the coefficient vector and the outlier pattern are sparse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Regularization and Variable Selection Via the Elastic Net
Zou, H., & Hastie, T. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x · Cited by 20,957
Efron, B., Hastie, T., Johnstone, I., & Tibshirani, R. (2004) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053604000000067 · Cited by 9,357
Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage
Donoho, D. L., & Johnstone, I. M. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.425 · Cited by 8,760
Robust Regression and Outlier Detection
Piepel, G. F. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488524 · Cited by 6,144
Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions
Ruppert, D. (1987) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269782 · Cited by 3,880
Least Median of Squares Regression
Rousseeuw, P. J. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10477105 · Cited by 3,835
Sure Independence Screening for Ultrahigh Dimensional Feature Space
Fan, J., & Lv, J. (2008) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00674.x · Cited by 2,711
Rectangular Confidence Regions for the Means of Multivariate Normal Distributions
Šidák, Z. (1967) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1967.10482935 · Cited by 2,639
Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing
(2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2010-0-67044-1 · Cited by 2,055
Cited by
Non-convex Optimization for Machine Learning
Jain, P., & Kar, P. (2017) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000058 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- She, Y., & Owen, A. B.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 494
- Pages
- 626-639
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1969515697
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outlier Detection Using Nonconvex Penalized Regression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/jasa.2011.tm10390
- The paper
- She, Y., & Owen, A. B. (2011). Outlier Detection Using Nonconvex Penalized Regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2011.tm10390
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.