The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rank − 1 / 2: A Simple Way to Improve the OLS Estimation of Tail Exponents
Abstract
Despite the availability of more sophisticated methods, a popular way to estimate a Pareto exponent is still to run an OLS regression: log(Rank) = a − b log(Size), and take b as an estimate of the Pareto exponent. The reason for this popularity is arguably the simplicity and robustness of this method. Unfortunately, this procedure is strongly biased in small samples. We provide a simple practical remedy for this bias, and propose that, if one wants to use an OLS regression, one should use the Rank −1 / 2, and run log(Rank − 1 / 2) = a − b log(Size). The shift of 1 / 2 is optimal, and reduces the bias to a leading order. The standard error on the Pareto exponent ζ is not the OLS standard error, but is asymptotically (2 / n)1 / 2ζ. Numerical results demonstrate the advantage of the proposed approach over the standard OLS estimation procedures and indicate that it performs well under dependent heavy-tailed processes exhibiting deviations from power laws. The estimation procedures considered are illustrated using an empirical application to Zipf’s law for the United States city size distribution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms
Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282804322970814 · Cited by 4,030 · cited 1×
“…among other works, in Rosen and Resnick (1980), Alperovich (1989), Krugman (1996), Eaton and Eckstein (1997), Brakman et al. (1999), Dobkins and Ioannides (2000), Davis and Weinstein (2002), Levy (2003), Levy and Levy (2003), Helpman, Melitz, and Yeaple (2004), Soo (2005), and Klass et al. (2006).”
Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes
Axtell, R. L. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062081 · Cited by 1,839
The Forbes 400 and the Pareto wealth distribution
Klass, O. S., Biham, O., Levy, M., Malcai, O., & Solomon, S. (2006) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2005.08.020 · Cited by 187
Cited by
An Anatomy of International Trade: Evidence From French Firms
(2011) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta8318 · Cited by 1,148
Form Follows Function? Linking Morphological and Functional Polycentricity
Burger, M., & Meijers, E. (2012) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/0042098011407095 · Cited by 481
The Network Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations
Acemoglu, D., Carvalho, V. M., Ozdaglar, A. E., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1947096 · Cited by 440
Power Laws in Economics: An Introduction
Gabaix, X. (2016) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.30.1.185 · Cited by 435
Self-citationThe influence of urban form on GHG emissions in the U.S. household sector
Lee, S., & Lee, B. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.024 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Gabaix, X., & Ibragimov, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-39
- ISSN
- 0735-0015 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2707
- OpenAlex
- W3121843706
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 49.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rank − 1 / 2: A Simple Way to Improve the OLS Estimation of Tail Exponents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/jbes.2009.06157
- The paper
- Gabaix, X., & Ibragimov, R. (2011). Rank − 1 / 2: A Simple Way to Improve the OLS Estimation of Tail Exponents. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1198/jbes.2009.06157
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.