Cited by 1Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementReproductive tract infections research

Lessons learned from evaluation of a human papillomavirus screening pilot in Uzbekistan

Open access
Zahirova, Nargiza, Tillyashaykhov, Mirzagaleb, Egamberdiev, Dilshod, Lucas, Eric, Rol, Maryluz, Inoyatova, Nodira, Akhmedova, Mukhabbat, Olkov, Ilya +2 more·2026·JCO Global Oncology

Abstract

Purpose In 2021, Ministry of Health conducted a pilot study to screen 50,000 women with human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in Uzbekistan and assess the feasibility of national implementation. The present article describes organization of the pilot, evaluation of the program using key performance indicators (KPIs), and lessons learned. Methods Women age 30-55 years were invited for HPV screening via a communication campaign at 11 polyclinics in Karakalpakstan province. Samples were collected and analyzed locally in nine polyclinics using GeneXpert test. HPV-positive women were triaged with colposcopy, although colposcopists were not trained to obtain biopsies or perform treatment. Abnormal results led to further diagnostic colposcopy and treatment. Pilot data were managed using an Excel database, with quality assurance through regular monitoring visits and estimation of KPIs. Results Over 10 months, 50,000 women were tested for HPV, with 98% yielding satisfactory results and a 6.8% positivity rate. Of the HPV-positive women, 93.9% underwent triaging colposcopy, revealing abnormalities in 32.5%, although results varied by district. Diagnostic colposcopy and histopathology data were available for 87.9% of referrals. Treatment adherence was not systematically tracked. An external review showed 64.6% agreement with local histopathology, and the correlation between diagnostic colposcopy and histopathology was 53.2%. Conclusion The pilot successfully recruited a large number of wome…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/go-25-00250

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 5 · Cited by 1

Authors
Zahirova, N., Tillyashaykhov, M., Egamberdiev, D., Lucas, E., Rol, M., Inoyatova, N., Akhmedova, M., Olkov, I., Muwonge, R., & Basu, P.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan (UZ)
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers, Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan
  • Tashkent Medical Academy (UZ)
  • International Papillomavirus Society (IPVS), San Francisco, CA
Venue
JCO Global Oncology
Published
2026-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
e2500250-e2500250
ISSN
2687-8941 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7124429587
Cited by
1
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • JCO Global Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
human papillomavirus screening, cervical cancer screening, HPV testing, GeneXpert, colposcopy, histopathology, screening program implementation, key performance indicators, referral pathways, quality assurance, decentralization of health services, Uzbekistan, Karakalpakstan
MeSH terms
Human Papillomavirus Viruses, Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Colposcopy, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Uzbekistan, Papillomavirus Infections, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review