Lessons learned from evaluation of a human papillomavirus screening pilot in Uzbekistan
Open accessAbstract
Purpose In 2021, Ministry of Health conducted a pilot study to screen 50,000 women with human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in Uzbekistan and assess the feasibility of national implementation. The present article describes organization of the pilot, evaluation of the program using key performance indicators (KPIs), and lessons learned. Methods Women age 30-55 years were invited for HPV screening via a communication campaign at 11 polyclinics in Karakalpakstan province. Samples were collected and analyzed locally in nine polyclinics using GeneXpert test. HPV-positive women were triaged with colposcopy, although colposcopists were not trained to obtain biopsies or perform treatment. Abnormal results led to further diagnostic colposcopy and treatment. Pilot data were managed using an Excel database, with quality assurance through regular monitoring visits and estimation of KPIs. Results Over 10 months, 50,000 women were tested for HPV, with 98% yielding satisfactory results and a 6.8% positivity rate. Of the HPV-positive women, 93.9% underwent triaging colposcopy, revealing abnormalities in 32.5%, although results varied by district. Diagnostic colposcopy and histopathology data were available for 87.9% of referrals. Treatment adherence was not systematically tracked. An external review showed 64.6% agreement with local histopathology, and the correlation between diagnostic colposcopy and histopathology was 53.2%. Conclusion The pilot successfully recruited a large number of wome…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The high diagnostic precision (AUC 0.95) of our triage stands in contrast to regional pilots, such as in Uzbekistan, where lower correlations between colposcopy and histopathology limited program efficacy (correlation only 53.2%).
“The high diagnostic precision (AUC of 0.95; Figure 3) of our triage stands in contrast to regional pilots, such as in Uzbekistan, where lower correlations between colposcopy and histopathology limited program efficacy (correlation between diagnostic colposcopy and histopathology was only 53.2%).23”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 5 · Cited by 1
- Authors
- Zahirova, N., Tillyashaykhov, M., Egamberdiev, D., Lucas, E., Rol, M., Inoyatova, N., Akhmedova, M., Olkov, I., Muwonge, R., & Basu, P.
- Affiliations
- Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan (UZ)
- Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
- Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers, Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan
- Tashkent Medical Academy (UZ)
- International Papillomavirus Society (IPVS), San Francisco, CA
- ORCID
- Venue
- JCO Global Oncology
- Published
- 2026-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e2500250-e2500250
- ISSN
- 2687-8941 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7124429587
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- JCO Global Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Keywords
- human papillomavirus screening, cervical cancer screening, HPV testing, GeneXpert, colposcopy, histopathology, screening program implementation, key performance indicators, referral pathways, quality assurance, decentralization of health services, Uzbekistan, Karakalpakstan
- MeSH terms
- Human Papillomavirus Viruses, Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Colposcopy, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Uzbekistan, Papillomavirus Infections, Early Detection of Cancer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review