The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Combined 5-fluorouracil and radiation therapy as a surgical adjuvant for poor prognosis gastric carcinoma.
Abstract
Sixty-two patients with resectable but poor-prognosis gastric carcinoma were randomized to either no surgical adjuvant therapy or treatment with 5-fluorouracil (15 mg/kg by rapid intravenous injection X 3) plus radiation (3,750 rad in 24 fractions) initiated 3 1/2 to six weeks postoperatively. Informed consent was obtained after randomization and only from the 39 randomized to treatment. Ten patients refused their treatment assignment. The five-year survival rate for patients randomized to treatment was 23%, and for those randomized to no treatment, 4% (P less than .05). Both the survival distributions and the alive-without-recurrence distributions were significantly different for the two groups (P = .024) and favored treatment assignment. When the treatment assignment group was broken down to those patients actually receiving treatment and those refusing, five-year survival rates were: treated, 20%; treatment refusal, 30%; controls, 4%; the three survival distributions were not significantly different. Thirty-nine percent of patients actually treated had a local-regional component of first clinical recurrence compared with 54% of those who received no treatment. This study does not establish 5-fluorouracil plus radiation as effective surgical adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer but suggests this approach as a possible fruitful area for continued research. This study also illustrates the potential problems that may be encountered in interpreting results when patients are randomized to a study before consent is obtained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Orditura, M. (2014) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i7.1635 · Cited by 623
Catalano, V., Labianca, R., Beretta, G. D., Gatta, G., de Braud, F., & Van Cutsem, E. (2009) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.01.004 · Cited by 365
Systematic review to determine whether participation in a trial influences outcome
Vist, G. E., Hagen, K. B., Devereaux, P. J., Bryant, D., Kristoffersen, D. T., & Oxman, A. D. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7501.1175 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Moertel, C. G., Childs, D. S., O'Fallon, J. R., Holbrook, M. A., Schutt, A. J., & Reitemeier, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1984-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1249-1254
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2179180688
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combined 5-fluorouracil and radiation therapy as a surgical adjuvant for poor prognosis gastric carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1984.2.11.1249
- The paper
- Moertel, C. G., Childs, D. S., O'Fallon, J. R., Holbrook, M. A., Schutt, A. J., & Reitemeier, R. J. (1984). Combined 5-fluorouracil and radiation therapy as a surgical adjuvant for poor prognosis gastric carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1984.2.11.1249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.