The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A randomized trial of fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Abstract
We determined the therapeutic effect of fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with folinic acid (FA) in patients with measurable recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum by comparing it to standard 5-FU therapy in a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to receive either FA, 200 mg/m2/d for five consecutive days, or nothing. All patients received 5-FU, 370 mg/m2/d for five days on the first course, with subsequent dose modifications to maintain equal toxicity in the two arms. One hundred thirty patients were entered on trial and only five were excluded from the analysis because they did not meet the eligibility criteria or they refused therapy after randomization. The two treatment arms were balanced for 11 clinical characteristics. Patients were evaluated for response at the end of every two treatment courses and toxicity after every course of therapy. Median follow-up was 1.45 years. Dose-limiting toxicity was mucositis and diarrhea on this treatment schedule, although neutropenia was apparent. The response rate was 33% (21 of 63 patients) in the 5-FU and FA arm and was 7% (four of 61 patients) in the 5-FU arm (P less than .0005). Time to disease progression was significantly different in the combination arm as compared with the single-agent arm (P = .023). Overall survival was significantly longer for patients treated with 5-FU and FA as compared with those receiving 5-FU alone (P = .05). The median survival was 12.6 months for patients receiving the combination, and 9.6 months for those receiving 5-FU alone. Our results indicate that the combination of 5-FU and FA is effective treatment for patients with metastatic or recurrent carcinoma of the rectum and colon who have not received prior chemotherapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lokich, J. J., Ahlgren, J. D., Gullo, J. J., Philips, J. A., & Fryer, J. G. (1989) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1989.7.4.425 · Cited by 773
Scheithauer, W., Rosen, H., Kornek, G. V., Sebesta, C., & Depisch, D. (1993) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.306.6880.752 · Cited by 654
Arbuck (1989) · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19890315)63:6+<1036::aid-cncr2820631309>3.0.co;2-k
Metadata
- Authors
- Erlichman, C., Fine, S., Wong, A., & Elhakim, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1988-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 469-475
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2253033732
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomized trial of fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1988.6.3.469
- The paper
- Erlichman, C., Fine, S., Wong, A., & Elhakim, T. (1988). A randomized trial of fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1988.6.3.469
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.