The DOI matches its Crossref record.
HER-2/neu oncogene protein and prognosis in breast cancer.
Abstract
Amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene was recently reported to predict poor clinical outcome in node-positive breast cancer patients. Since expression of the oncogene as its protein product might be even more closely related than gene amplification to disease progression, we have now examined levels of the HER-2/neu oncogene protein for its prognostic potential in both node-positive and node-negative breast cancer. Using Western blot analysis, levels of this protein were determined in 728 primary human breast tumor specimens. We examined relationships between this protein and other established markers of prognosis, as well as clinical outcome. In node-negative patients (n = 378), the HER-2/neu protein failed to predict disease outcome. However, in node-positive patients (n = 350), those patients with higher HER-2/neu protein had statistically shorter disease-free (P = .0014) and overall survival (P less than .0001) than patients with lower levels of the protein. Higher HER-2/neu protein was found in tumors without estrogen receptor (ER) (P = .02) or progesterone receptor (PgR) (P = .0003), and in patients with more than three positive lymph nodes (P = .04). A significant correlation between levels of the HER-2/neu gene protein and amplification of the gene itself was also found (n = 48, P less than .001). Multivariate analyses in these patients showed that the HER-2/neu protein is a significant independent predictor of both the disease-free and the overall survival in node-positive breast cancer, even when other prognostic factors are considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
c-erbB-2 Expression and Response to Adjuvant Therapy in Women with Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer
Muss, H. B., Thor, A. D., Berry, D. A., Kute, T., Liu, E. T., Koerner, F., Cirrincione, C. T., Budman, D. R., Wood, W. C., Barcos, M., et al. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199405053301802 · Cited by 961
Press, M. F., Bernstein, L., Thomas, P. A., Meisner, L. F., Zhou, J. Y., Ma, Y., Hung, G., Robinson, R. A., Harris, C., El-Naggar, A., et al. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.8.2894 · Cited by 802
Osborne, C. K., Bardou, V., Hopp, T. A., Chamness, G. C., Hilsenbeck, S. G., Fuqua, S. A. W., Wong, J., Allred, D. C., Clark, G. M., & Schiff, R. (2003) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/95.5.353 · Cited by 786
Self-citationTissue Microarrays for Rapid Linking of Molecular Changes to Clinical Endpoints
Torhorst, J., Bucher, C., Kononen, J., Haas, P., Zuber, M., Köchli, O. R., Mross, F., Dieterich, H., Moch, H., Mihatsch, M., et al. (2001) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63075-1 · Cited by 566
ERBB2 amplification in breast cancer analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization
Kallioniemi, O. P., Kallioniemi, A., Kurisu, W., Thor, A., Chen, L. C., Smith, H. S., Waldman, F. M., Pinkel, D., & Gray, J. W. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.12.5321 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Tandon, A. K., Clark, G. M., Chamness, G. C., Ullrich, A., & McGuire, W. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1989-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1120-1128
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2291927913
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HER-2/neu oncogene protein and prognosis in breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1989.7.8.1120
- The paper
- Tandon, A. K., Clark, G. M., Chamness, G. C., Ullrich, A., & McGuire, W. L. (1989). HER-2/neu oncogene protein and prognosis in breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1989.7.8.1120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.