The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A randomized trial of anticoagulation with warfarin and of alternating chemotherapy in extensive small-cell lung cancer by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.
Abstract
The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a prospective randomized trial to evaluate the role of warfarin and alternating chemotherapy in extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCCL). After stratification for sex and performance status, patients were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy with methotrexate, doxorubicin (Adriamycin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), cyclophosphamide, and lomustine (CCNU) (MACC), or MACC plus warfarin (MACC + W), or mitomycin, etoposide, cisplatin, and hexamethylmelamine alternating with MACC (MEPH/MACC). Warfarin was given continuously to maintain a prothrombin time of one and one half to twice the control values. A total of 328 patients were enrolled, and 294 were evaluable. There was a statistically significant advantage in objective response rates (complete [CR] and partial responses [PR], respectively) for MACC + W (17% and 50%) as compared with MACC alone (8% and 43%) or MEPH/MACC (10% and 38%) (P = .012). Both failure-free survival (P = .054 Wilcoxon test) and overall survival (P = .098 Wilcoxon test) were higher on MACC + W (median, 6.6 months and 9.3 months, respectively), as compared with MACC (5.0 months and 7.9 months) and MEPH/MACC (5.0 months and 7.9 months). Toxicity was comparable among the three arms, except for increased hemorrhagic events on MACC + W, which were life-threatening in four patients (4%), and lethal in two others (2%). These data support the role of warfarin in the treatment of SCCL, but do not establish its mechanism of action. Warfarin deserves further studies in SCCL, particularly in patients with limited disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lyman, G. H., Carrier, M., Ay, C., Di Nisio, M., Hicks, L. K., Khorana, A. A., Leavitt, A. D., Lee, A. Y. Y., Macbeth, F., Morgan, R. L., et al. (2021) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003442 · Cited by 893
The Hypercoagulable State of Malignancy: Pathogenesis and Current Debate
Caine, G. J., Stonelake, P. S., Lip, G. Y. H., & Kehoe, S. T. (2002) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1038/sj.neo.7900263 · Cited by 576
Altinbas, M., Coskun, H. S., Er, O., Ozkan, M., Eser, B., Unal, A., Cetin, M., & Soyuer, S. (2004) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00871.x · Cited by 455
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Di Nisio, M., Porreca, E., Ferrante, N., Otten, H.-M., Cuccurullo, F., & Rutjes, A. W. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008500.pub2 · Cited by 264
Young, A., Chapman, O., Connor, C., Poole, C., Rose, P., & Kakkar, A. K. (2012) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.106 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Chahinian, A. P., Propert, K. J., Ware, J. H., Zimmer, B., Perry, M. C., Hirsh, V, Skarin, A., Kopel, S., Holland, J. F., & Comis, R. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1989-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 993-1002
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1895600627
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomized trial of anticoagulation with warfarin and of alternating chemotherapy in extensive small-cell lung cancer by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1989.7.8.993
- The paper
- Chahinian, A. P., Propert, K. J., Ware, J. H., Zimmer, B., Perry, M. C., Hirsh, V, Skarin, A., Kopel, S., Holland, J. F., & Comis, R. L. (1989). A randomized trial of anticoagulation with warfarin and of alternating chemotherapy in extensive small-cell lung cancer by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1989.7.8.993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.