The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Report of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored workshop on definitions of diagnosis and response in acute myeloid leukemia.
Abstract
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) sponsored a workshop to develop a set of standardized diagnostic and response criteria for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) clinical trials. The French-American-British (FAB) classification was retained for diagnosing AML, with the addition of patients with bone marrow morphologic features of a myelodysplastic syndrome and less than 30% bone marrow blasts, but with greater than or equal to 30% blasts in the peripheral blood. In this report, there are four important subgroups of AML not defined in the FAB classification that are discussed: undifferentiated acute leukemia, MO (AML lacking definitive myeloid differentiation by morphology or conventional cytochemistry but with ultrastructural or immunophenotypic evidence for AML), mixed lineage leukemia, and hypocellular AML. Definitions of response for clinical trials are presented to facilitate comparisons among different studies. Complete remission is considered the only response worth reporting in phase III trials, since lesser responses do not improve survival. Partial remissions may be of interest to identify active new agents in phase I and II studies. Monoclonal antibodies and cytogenetic studies are not part of the routine assessment of remission or reassessment at relapse, and their role in the evaluation of patients with AML is currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Although we recognize that some of the definitions in this report are arbitrary, generalized use of these guidelines will make results of clinical trials more comparable and interpretable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
All-trans-Retinoic Acid in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
Tallman, M. S., Andersen, J. W., Schiffer, C. A., Appelbaum, F. R., Feusner, J. H., Ogden, A., Shepherd, L., Willman, C., Bloomfield, C. D., Rowe, J. M., et al. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199710093371501 · Cited by 1,073
Self-citationOttmann, O. G. (2002) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2001-12-0181 · Cited by 555
Kayser, S., Döhner, K., Krauter, J., Köhne, C.-H., Horst, H. A., Held, G., von Lilienfeld-Toal, M., Wilhelm, S., Kündgen, A., Götze, K., et al. (2011) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2010-08-301713 · Cited by 487
Tallman, M. S. (2002) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2002-02-0632 · Cited by 482
Gore, S. D., Baylin, S., Sugar, E., Carraway, H., Miller, C. B., Carducci, M., Grever, M., Galm, O., Dauses, T., Karp, J. E., et al. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0080 · Cited by 474
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheson, B. D., Cassileth, P. A., Head, D. R., Schiffer, C. A., Bennett, J. M., Bloomfield, C. D., Brunning, R., Gale, R. P., Grever, M. R., & Keating, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1990-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 813-819
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1919339218
- Cited by
- 770
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Report of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored workshop on definitions of diagnosis and response in acute myeloid leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1990.8.5.813
- The paper
- Cheson, B. D., Cassileth, P. A., Head, D. R., Schiffer, C. A., Bennett, J. M., Bloomfield, C. D., Brunning, R., Gale, R. P., Grever, M. R., & Keating, M. J. (1990). Report of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored workshop on definitions of diagnosis and response in acute myeloid leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1990.8.5.813
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.