Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 435

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prediction of early relapse in patients with operable breast cancer by detection of occult bone marrow micrometastases.

Cote, R J, Rosen, P P, Lesser, M L, Old, L J, Osborne, M P·1991·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

We used monoclonal antibodies to identify occult micrometastases in the bone marrow of 49 patients with operable (stage I and II) breast carcinoma. Follow-up (mean, 29 months; median, 30 months) revealed that 12 patients recurred. The presence of bone marrow micrometastases (BMM) was significantly associated with early recurrence (P less than .04). The estimated 2-year recurrence rate for patients with no BMM detected (BMM-) was 3%; in patients with BMM, the 2-year recurrence rate was 33%. When BMM and axillary lymph node (LN) status were combined, groups of patients at low risk (LN-, BMM-; 2-year recurrence rate, 0%) and high risk (LN+, BMM+; 2-year recurrence rate, 42%) for early recurrence were identified. Bone marrow tumor burden was related to early recurrence. Among patients with BMM, those who did not recur had on average fewer extrinsic cells in their marrow than those who recurred (15 v 43 cells, respectively). Multivariate analysis comparing BMM, LN+ versus LN-, and tumor size (less than or equal to 2 cm v greater than 2 cm) revealed no factor independently associated with early recurrence. Peripheral tumor burden of BMM (0 or less than 10 extrinsic cells v greater than or equal to 10 extrinsic cells) was the only independent predictor of early recurrence (P less than .003). In conjunction with conventional prognostic factors, particularly axillary LN status, evaluation for BMM might be used to stratify patients for adjuvant treatment programs. Because this pilot study involved few patients with short-term follow-up, the results should be interpreted with caution. The examination of bone marrow for micrometastases remains an experimental procedure; the clinical usefulness of the test will be established through larger studies with long-term follow-up.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1991.9.10.1749

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cote, R. J., Rosen, P. P., Lesser, M. L., Old, L. J., & Osborne, M. P.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1991-10
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
1749-1756
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2218220018
Cited by
435
References
0
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.