The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Burnout syndrome in the practice of oncology: results of a random survey of 1,000 oncologists.
Abstract
Burnout, the end result of stress, can occur in any profession. We set out to determine the extent of burnout among a representative group of American oncologists. A questionnaire with 12 specific points was designed and prepared by the authors. It was mailed to 1,000 randomly selected physician subscribers to the Journal of Clinical Oncology. Five hundred ninety-eight completed surveys (60%) were returned before the cut-off date and included in the analysis. Overall, 56% of the respondents reported experiencing burnout in their professional life. No significance was found between the incidence of burnout and specialty within oncology, year medical training ended, or practice location. Significance was found, however, between type of practice and the incidence of burnout; institution- or university-based oncologists reported a lower incidence of burnout (47%) versus all other types of practice (66% burnout rate for oncology plus internal medicine, 63% for private adult oncology only, 39% for pediatric oncologists [there were too few pediatric oncologists for this rate to be significant], and 64% for others; P = .0003). Frustration or a sense of failure was the most frequently chosen (56%) description of burnout, and insufficient personal and/or vacation time was the most frequent reason (57%) chosen to explain the existence of burnout. To alleviate burnout, the majority (69%) of respondents indicated the need for more vacation or personal time. Administering palliative or terminal care, reimbursement issues, and a heavy work load were identified as contributing factors to burnout. Given the high response to the questionnaire and a 56% incidence of burnout in the surveyed population, it is concluded that further research on this issue is required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prevalence of Burnout Among Physicians: A Systematic Review
Rotenstein, L. S., Torre, M., Ramos, M. A., Rosales, R. C., Guille, C., Sen, S., & Mata, D. A. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12777 · Cited by 1,904
Burnout and Career Satisfaction Among American Surgeons
Shanafelt, T. D., Balch, C. M., Bechamps, G. J., Russell, T., Dyrbye, L., Satele, D., Collicott, P., Novotny, P. J., Sloan, J., & Freischlag, J. A. (2009) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181ac4dfd · Cited by 1,275
Shanafelt, T. D., Sloan, J. A., & Habermann, T. M. (2003) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00117-7 · Cited by 813
Psychiatric morbidity and its recognition by doctors in patients with cancer
Fallowfield, L., Ratcliffe, D., Jenkins, V, & Saul, J. (2001) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.2001.1724 · Cited by 694
How Do Distress and Well-being Relate to Medical Student Empathy? A Multicenter Study
Thomas, M. R., Dyrbye, L. N., Huntington, J. L., Lawson, K. L., Novotny, P. J., Sloan, J. A., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2007) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-006-0039-6 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Whippen, D. A., & Canellos, G. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1991-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1916-1920
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1915544525
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Burnout syndrome in the practice of oncology: results of a random survey of 1,000 oncologists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1991.9.10.1916
- The paper
- Whippen, D. A., & Canellos, G. P. (1991). Burnout syndrome in the practice of oncology: results of a random survey of 1,000 oncologists. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1991.9.10.1916
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.