The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sequences of taxol and cisplatin: a phase I and pharmacologic study.
Abstract
Untreated and minimally pretreated solid tumor patients received alternating sequences of taxol and cisplatin. Sequential dose escalation of each agent using taxol doses of 110 or 135 mg/m2 and cisplatin doses of 50 or 75 mg/m2 resulted in four dosage permutations that induced grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in 72% to 84% and 50% to 53% of courses, respectively. Neutropenia was brief, and hospitalization for neutropenia and fever was required in 13% to 24% of courses. However, further escalation of taxol to 170 or 200 mg/m2 induced grade 4 neutropenia in 79% to 82% of courses. At the highest taxol-cisplatin dose level (200 mg/m2 to 75 mg/m2), the mean neutrophil count nadir was 98/microL, and hospitalization for neutropenia and fever was required in 64% of courses. The sequence of cisplatin before taxol, which has less antitumor activity in vitro, induced more profound neutropenia than the alternate sequence. Pharmacologic studies indicated that this difference was probably due to 25% lower taxol clearance rates when cisplatin preceded taxol. Although neurotoxicity was initially thought to be a potentially serious effect of the combination, mild to modest neurotoxicity occurred in only 27% of patients. Adverse effects also included myalgias, alopecia, vomiting, diarrhea, bradycardia, and asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia. Objective responses were noted in melanoma, as well as non-small-cell lung, ovarian, breast, head and neck, colon, and pancreatic carcinomas. Based on these results, the sequence of taxol before cisplatin at doses of 135 and 75 mg/m2, respectively, is recommended for phase II/III trials, with escalation of taxol to 170 mg/m2 if treatment is well tolerated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rowinsky, E. K., & Donehower, R. C. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199504133321507 · Cited by 1,924
Self-citationXiao, H., Song, H., Yang, Q., Cai, H., Qi, R., Yan, L., Liu, S., Zheng, Y., Huang, Y., Liu, T., et al. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.049 · Cited by 200
Cai, L., Xu, G., Shi, C., Guo, D., Wang, X., & Luo, J. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.044 · Cited by 151
Song, W., Tang, Z., Li, M., Lv, S., Sun, H., Deng, M., Liu, H., & Chen, X. (2014) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.026 · Cited by 126
Biodegradable hybrid polymer micelles for combination drug therapy in ovarian cancer
Desale, S. S., Cohen, S. M., Zhao, Y., Kabanov, A. V., & Bronich, T. K. (2013) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.04.026 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Rowinsky, E. K., Gilbert, M. R., McGuire, W. P., Noe, D. A., Grochow, L. B., Forastiere, A. A., Ettinger, D. S., Lubejko, B. G., Clark, B., & Sartorius, S. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1991-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1692-1703
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1723772693
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sequences of taxol and cisplatin: a phase I and pharmacologic study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1991.9.9.1692
- The paper
- Rowinsky, E. K., Gilbert, M. R., McGuire, W. P., Noe, D. A., Grochow, L. B., Forastiere, A. A., Ettinger, D. S., Lubejko, B. G., Clark, B., & Sartorius, S. E. (1991). Sequences of taxol and cisplatin: a phase I and pharmacologic study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1991.9.9.1692
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.