The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Does thoracic irradiation improve survival and local control in limited-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung? A meta-analysis.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Our main purpose was to determine whether the addition of thoracic radiation therapy to systemic chemotherapy improves 2-year survival, improves local (intrathoracic) tumor control, and affects treatment-related mortality in patients with limited-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung. DESIGN: Eleven randomized trials addressing this issue were identified using a computerized literature search (Medline and Cancerline) and by polling senior investigators in the field. A meta-analysis was then performed and the results of the trials were analyzed in two ways, the odds ratio (OR) (Peto) method and the risk difference method (Dersimonian and Laird). RESULTS: The overall OR for benefit of thoracic radiation on 2-year survival (ie, the odds of surviving 2 years among patients allocated to radiation compared with the odds of surviving 2 years among patients allocated to control) is 1.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30 to 1.76; chi 2 = 12.76; P less than .001). The risk difference method showed that radiation therapy improved 2-year survival by 5.4% (95% CI, 1.1% to 9.7%). Local control results were available for only nine studies, the OR for treatment benefit is 3.02 (95% CI, 2.80 to 3.24; chi 2 = 101.48; P less than .0001), and intrathoracic tumor control was improved by 25.3% (95% CI, 16.5% to 34.1%). The OR for excess treatment-related deaths in the thoracic radiation-treated patients was 2.54 (95% CI, 1.90 to 3.18; chi 2 = 8.24; P less than .01). The risk difference for treatment-related deaths was 1.2% (95% CI, -0.6% to 3.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows a small but significant improvement in survival and a major improvement in tumor control in the thorax in patients receiving thoracic radiation therapy. However, this is achieved at the cost of a small increase in treatment-related mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sundstrøm, S., Bremnes, R. M., Kaasa, S., Aasebø, U., Hatlevoll, R., Dahle, R., Boye, N., Wang, M., Vigander, T., Vilsvik, J., et al. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2002.12.111 · Cited by 499
Radiotherapy treatment for lung cancer: Current status and future directions
Vinod, S. K., & Hau, E. (2020) · Respirology · doi:10.1111/resp.13870 · Cited by 412
Phase 1/2 Trial of Pembrolizumab and Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy for Limited-Stage SCLC
Welsh, J. W., Heymach, J. V., Guo, C., Menon, H., Klein, K., Cushman, T. R., Verma, V., Hess, K. R., Shroff, G., Tang, C., et al. (2020) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2020.08.022 · Cited by 101
Nanocarrier-based targeted pulmonary delivery: novel approaches for effective lung cancer treatment
Shah, M. R., Imran, M., & Ullah, S. (2019) · Nanocarriers for Cancer Diagnosis and Targeted Chemotherapy · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816773-1.00006-7 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Warde, P., & Payne, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 890-895
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1905406155
- Cited by
- 816
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does thoracic irradiation improve survival and local control in limited-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung? A meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1992.10.6.890
- The paper
- Warde, P., & Payne, D. (1992). Does thoracic irradiation improve survival and local control in limited-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung? A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1992.10.6.890
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.