The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic importance of immunocytochemically determined c-erbB-2 overexpression in the primary tumors of patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Primary tumors from 1,506 breast cancer patients (760 node-negative and 746 node-positive) who were treated in the International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group Trial V were studied. Node-negative patients were allocated randomly to either a single cycle of perioperative chemotherapy (PeCT) or no adjuvant treatment, and node-positive patients received either a prolonged chemotherapy (with tamoxifen for postmenopausal patients) or a single perioperative cycle. RESULTS: Tumors from 16% of the node-negative patients and 19% of the node-positive patients were found to be c-erbB-2-positive. In both groups c-erbB-2 positivity correlated with negative progesterone receptors (PR), negative estrogen receptors (ER), and high tumor grade. Lobular carcinomas were all negative, and, thus support the view that such tumors represent a defined subtype of breast carcinoma. The expression of c-erbB-2 was prognostically significant for node-positive but not for node-negative patients. However, in both subgroups, the prognostic significance was greater for patients who had received more adjuvant therapy. For node-positive patients, the effect of prolonged-duration therapy on disease-free survival (DFS) was greater for patients without c-erbB-2 overexpression (hazards ratio [HR], = 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.72) than for those with c-erbB-2 overexpression (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.16). Similarly, for node-negative patients, the effect of PeCT on DFS was greater for those without c-erbB-2 overexpression (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.09) than for those with c-erbB-2 overexpression (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.66 to 2.25). CONCLUSION: We conclude that tumors with overexpression of the c-erbB-2 oncogene are less responsive to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF)-containing adjuvant therapy regimens than those with a normal amount of gene product.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Emran, T. B., Shahriar, A., Mahmud, A. R., Rahman, T., Abir, M. H., Siddiquee, M. F. R., Ahmed, H., Rahman, N., Nainu, F., Wahyudin, E., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.891652 · Cited by 606
ERBB2 oncogene in human breast cancer and its clinical significance
Révillion, F., Bonneterre, J., & Peyrat, J. P. (1998) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(97)10157-5 · Cited by 448
Paik, S. (2000) · Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.24.1991 · Cited by 304
Hurley, J., Doliny, P., Reis, I., Silva, O., Gomez-Fernandez, C., Velez, P., Pauletti, G., Powell, J. E., Pegram, M. D., & Slamon, D. J. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.02.8886 · Cited by 245
Ahcene Djaballah, S., Daniel, F., Milani, A., Ricagno, G., & Lonardi, S. (2022) · American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · doi:10.1200/edbk_351354 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Gusterson, B. A., Gelber, R. D., Goldhirsch, A., Price, K. N., Säve-Söderborgh, J., Anbazhagan, R., Styles, J., Rudenstam, C. M., Golouh, R., & Reed, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1049-1056
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1755920412
- Cited by
- 838
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1992.10.7.1049
- The paper
- Gusterson, B. A., Gelber, R. D., Goldhirsch, A., Price, K. N., Säve-Söderborgh, J., Anbazhagan, R., Styles, J., Rudenstam, C. M., Golouh, R., & Reed, R. (1992). Prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1992.10.7.1049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.