The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Double-blind controlled trial of oral clodronate in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Osteolytic metastases often give rise to hypercalcemia, fracture, and bone pain, and occur commonly in patients with recurrent breast cancer. We assessed the bisphosphonate, clodronate, which has proven to be a useful treatment for hypercalcemia and may be a potent inhibitor of tumor-induced osteolysis, for its effect on reducing the osseous complications of metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 173 patients with bone metastases due to breast cancer in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral clodronate 1,600 mg/d (85 patients) compared with an identical placebo (88 patients). RESULTS: The patients in each wing were comparable in their clinical, radiologic, and biochemical characteristics at trial entry. In patients who received clodronate, there was a significant reduction compared with placebo in the total number of hypercalcemic episodes (28 v 52; P < .01), in the number of terminal hypercalcemic episodes (seven v 17; P < .05), in the incidence of vertebral fractures (84 v 124 per 100 patient-years; P < .025), and in the rate of vertebral deformity (168 v 252 per 100 patient-years; P < .001). The combined rate of all morbid skeletal events was significantly reduced (218.6 v 304.8 per 100 patient-years; P < .001). Trends were seen in favor of clodronate for nonvertebral fracture rates and radiotherapy requirements for bone pain (particularly spinal pain). No significant survival differences and no significant differences in side effects were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that oral clodronate has a beneficial effect on the skeletal morbidity associated with breast cancer and should be considered as antiosteolytic therapy in affected patients. It deserves further investigation as an adjuvant therapy in operable breast cancer and in patients with nonosseous recurrence who are at high risk for bone metastases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency
Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998 · Cited by 10,490
Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies
Coleman, R. E. (2001) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1053/ctrv.2000.0210 · Cited by 1,920
Bisphosphonates: Mechanisms of Action
Fleisch, H. (1998) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.19.1.0325 · Cited by 1,019
The effect of a single dose of osteoprotegerin in postmenopausal women.
Bekker, P. J., Holloway, D., Nakanishi, A., Arrighi, M., Leese, P. T., & Dunstan, C. R. (2001) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.2.348 · Cited by 484
A randomized trial of the effect of clodronate on skeletal morbidity in multiple myeloma
McCloskey, MacLennan, Drayson, Chapman, Dunn, Kanis, & Adults, F. T. M. W. P. O. L. I. (1998) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00567.x · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Paterson, A. H., Powles, T. J., Kanis, J. A., McCloskey, E., Hanson, J., & Ashley, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-65
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1906721103
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Double-blind controlled trial of oral clodronate in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1993.11.1.59
- The paper
- Paterson, A. H., Powles, T. J., Kanis, J. A., McCloskey, E., Hanson, J., & Ashley, S. (1993). Double-blind controlled trial of oral clodronate in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1993.11.1.59
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.